I, me, Ralph Xxxxx: Xxxxx, Declare I am giving notice that I am rescinding, removing, revoking by cancellation of my signature from all documents held by or in the possession of the Corporation known as the DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, DALLAS COUNTY, DALLAS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CITY OF GARLAND, THE STATE OF TEXAS, and any agencies including and not limited to THE CITY OF GARLAND, any agents of the Crown with the title of Nobility of Esquire for commercial fraud, deceptive practice and failure of full disclosure to me.
[Criminal Complaint Posted March 3, 2004]
SECOND AND MANDATORY BY LAW AND MUST BE HEARD AND TRIED BY JURY
Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit. Presented by me the undersigned addressee, Ralph-Kenneth: Evans one of we the People of the several united States under original common law jurisdiction in the county of Dallas Texas court of record Art 5 Section 15 1876 Texas Constitution. Demand is made for trial by jury by law in the county court of record of the County of Dallas, Texas pursuant to the original law and original jurisdiction.
EQUALITY IS MANDATORY AND MANDATED BY LAW
In the Matter of claim numbers 2000890143 and 890143 conceived in fraud and remains in fraud this Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration is against : Commissioner of the Texas Veteran land Board and agents acting in collusion with: SECURITY Bank N. A. officers heirs agents and assigns and TEMPLE-INLAND CORPORATION, officers heirs agents and assigns and
GUARANTY Residential Lending, GUARANTY Bank officers heirs, agents and assigns and
Ronald E. Shults, Traci Mahan, Caroline Jones and Dee Dee Proctor (herein after Respondents)
Mailed by first class to the third party debt collectors:
GUARANTY Residential Lending
1300 S. Mopac Expressway
Austin, Texas 78746
And county Judge and county clerk county of Dallas, Texas
Under the Laws of the Republic and Texas a Commercial STATE the peoples Bill of Rights preserved by the Laws of the Commercial State of Texas Article one of the 1876 Constitution for the Commercial State of Texas as published in the 2003 edition.
This court has Original Jurisdiction under the above entitled heading (law of the land, the rules of Common Law).
I, me, Ralph-Kenneth: Evans the undersigned one of the People, Sovereign, living soul, the posterity, born upon the land in the one of several counties within the one of the several States united of America. I, me, the undersigned (hereinafter I, myself, me, Petitioner,) does hereby solemnly declare, say, and state:
1. I, me, the Petitioner competent to state the matters set forth herewith.
2. Petitioner has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
3. All the facts stated herein are true, correct and certain, admissible as evidence, and if testifying in a court of competent jurisdiction I, me, the Petitioner shall so state.
Plain Statement of Facts by declaration.
A matter must be expressed to be resolve. In commerce truth is sovereign. Truth is expressed in the form of an Declaration/Affidavit. An unrebutted Declaration/Affidavit stands as Truth in commerce. An unrebutted Declaration/Affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce. A Declaration/Affidavit of Truth, under commercial law, can only be satisfied: by a rebuttal Declaration/Affidavit of truth, by payment, by agreement, by resolution by a jury according to the rules of Common Law.
I, me, me the Petitioner am expressing truth by this Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit and is Presented by me the undersigned Petitioner.
WHEREAS, the public record is the highest form of evidence, I me, one of the Secured Parties am hereby timely creating public record by Declaration with this Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit.
For: Willful, corruptly, knowingly, by arbitrary and caprices acts, without certain exchange of consideration for Libel, with dolus malus, misapplication of corporation statute upon a man, causing crimes against a man by agents violating the terms and conditions of the Corporate Policy and Procedures and the Substantive Rights of me the Petitioner In violation of the Reseatment Act of Texas Legislators to the U.S. Congress March 30, 1870 and the Constitution of 1836 and 1876, Bill of Rights the organic Law of the Land of Texas.
I, me, the undersigned, the Petitioner, hereby make this Declaration for Civil and Criminal Complaint in the nature of an affidavit for and on the behalf of and as myself. I hereby Declare and certify under the Federal law Title 28 USC 1746 (1) and James 5: 12 when there is no conflict. I, me, Petitioner rebut any and all assumptions that I am of diminished capacity. I, am of sound mind, I am over the age of 65, I am not a ward of the state, I am not a member of any social subversive group, I am not required by law to have a guardian, trustee or any other commercial agent to represent me or to relinquish my power of attorney to any other party. I hold claim by title to land in the county of Dallas, Texas and no party has stepped forward to dispute my title. I am capable of managing my own affairs and speaking as my self. I declare I am over the age of sixty-five, of good moral character, have firsthand knowledge, and am competent to testify to the following facts. The facts stated herein are true, correct, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief, and show the following:
In the Matter of claim numbers 2000890143 and 890143 conceived in fraud and remains in fraud The Respondents through their agents Ronald E. Shults, Traci Mahan, Caroline Jones and Dee Dee Proctor have refused settlement of their claim by refusing to accept funds and release to me the said promissory note secured by a deed on a commercial address fraudulently claiming the deed is on the land when in fact it is only on the commercial address known as BEING LOT 6 IN BLOCK A OF REPLAT OF MALLARD COVE, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ROWLETT TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE REVISED MAP RECORDED IN VOLUME 86218, PAGE 3007 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED IN VOLUME 87124, PACE 1713 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
which has the address of 3424 MALLARD PARK
ROWLETT, TEXAS FEDERAL ZONE 75088
and using it and the fraudulent note for holding me and my property in slavery.
Facts
- There was/is fraudulent concealment of material facts in the promissory note and deed.
- The alleged lender endorsed the Promissory Note and deposited it like a check thereby altering it after it was signed and did not disclose this fact to the alleged borrower.
- The lender used the endorsed Promissory Note to fund the alleged loan to the alleged borrowers by drafting out of the deposit account and calling it a loan and charging interest on it.
- There was no consideration given on the alleged lenders part for the Promissory Note. For a binding contract to be created, consideration must be legally sufficient. To be legally sufficient consideration for a promise must be legally detrimental to the promisee. In this case the promisee (alleged lender) had no cost and no risk.
- Bookkeeping entries according to GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) show that the alleged lender deposited the Promissory Note of the alleged borrowers+ and increased both their assets and their liabilities.
- There was no explanation of material facts. Therefore, alleged borrowers did not understand the true terms of the note. Therefore there is no agreement. The promise to loan the alleged lenders money or other depositors money is illusionary without consideration and unenforceable.
- GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) require that the Respondents liability created from the promissory note shows that the Respondents owes the alleged borrowers an amount equal to the debt.
- There has been no validation of this debt sent to us which would comply with the Fair Debt Collection Practices and Fair Debt Credit Reporting Acts.
Declaration and SUMMARY OF DAMAGES BY Respondents:
1. Respondents made the alleged borrower, RALPH K. EVANS Copyright and REBECCA H. EVANS Copyright, depositors by depositing approximately 185,000.00 Dollars negotiable instrument, which the Respondents sold or had available to sell for approximately 185,000.00 Dollars in legal tender. The Respondents did not credit the borrowers transaction account showing the Respondents owed the borrower the 185,000.00 Dollars. Rather, the Respondents claimed that the alleged borrowers owed the Respondents the 185,000.00 Dollars, then placed a lien on the real property for 185,000.00 Dollars using a fraudulent deed on a commercial address and demanded loan payments or the Respondents would foreclose on the real land.
2. The Respondents deposited a non-legal tender negotiable instrument and exchanged it for another no-legal tender check, which traded like money, using the deposited negotiable instrument as the money deposited. The Respondents changed the currency without the borrowers authorization. First by depositing non legal tender from which to issue a check (which is non-legal tender) and using the negotiable instrument (the borrowers mortgage note), to exchange for legal tender, the Respondents needed to make the check appear to be backed by legal tender. No loan ever took place.
3. The transaction that took place was merely a change of currency (without authorization), a negotiable instrument for a check. The negotiable instrument was the money, which was exchanged for legal tender to make the check good. An exchange is not a loan. The Respondents exchanged 185,000.00 Dollars for 185,000.00 Dollars. There was no need to go to the Respondents any money. The borrowers did not receive a loan, the borrowers lost 185,000.00 Dollars in value to the Respondents, which the Respondents kept and recorded as a Respondents asset and never loaned any of the Respondents money.
4. The damages are 185,000.00 Dollars plus interest payments, which the Respondents demanded by mail The Respondents illegally placed a lien on the property using a fraudulent deed and then threatened to foreclose, further damaging the alleged borrowers, when and if the payments were not made.
5. The depositor being me. am owed money for the deposit and the alleged borrowers are owed money for the loan the Respondents never made and yet placed a lien on the real property demanding payment.
6. Damages exist in that the Respondents refused to loan their money. The Respondents denies the alleged borrowers equal protection under the law and contract, by merely exchanging one currency for another and refusing repayment in the same type of currency deposited. The Respondents refused to fulfill the contract by not loaning the money, and by the Respondents refusing to be repaid in the same currency, which they deposited as an exchange for another currency. A debt tender offered and refused is a debt paid to the extent of the offer. The Respondents has no authorization to alter the alleged contract and to refuse to perform by not loaning money, by changing the currency and then refusing repayment in what the Respondents has a written policy to deposit.
7. The money deposited for the check issued came from me not the Respondents. The Respondents has no right to the mortgage note until the Respondents performs by loaning the money.
8. In the transaction the Respondents was to loan legal tender to the borrowers, in order for the Respondents to secure a lien. The Respondents never made the loan, but kept the mortgage note the alleged borrowers signed. This allowed the Respondents to obtain the equity in the property (by a lien) and transfer the wealth of the property to the Respondents without the Respondents investment, loan, or risk of money. Then the Respondents received my labor to pay principal and Usury interest. What the borrowers owned or should have owned debt free, the Respondents obtained ownership in, and for free, in exchange for me receiving a debt, paying interest to the Respondents, all because the Respondents refused to loan money and merely exchanged one currency for another. This placed me in perpetual slavery to the Respondents because the Respondents refuses to perform under the contract. The lien forces payment by threat of foreclosure. The mail is used to extort payment on a contract the Respondents never fulfilled.
9. The Respondents refused to perform, so they must return the mortgage note and have refuse even after I offered to fund the debt with a certified check in full so I could be release from slavery to the Respondents. If the Respondents had wished to perform, then they must make the loan. The past payments must be returned because the Respondents had not right to lien the property and extort interest payments.
10. The Respondents has no right to sell a mortgage note for two reasons. The mortgage note was deposited and the money withdrawn without authorization by using forged signatures and; two, the contract was never fulfilled. The Respondents acted without authorization and is involved in a fraud thereby damaging me and the alleged borrowers.
11. The check was written without deducting funds from the Savings Accounts or Certificates of Deposits of the Respondents, allowing the mortgage note to become the new pool of money owed. The Respondents sold the mortgage note for Federal Reserve notes or other assets while still owing the liability for the mortgage note sold and without the Respondents giving up any Federal Reserve notes. If the Respondents had to part with the Federal Reserve notes, and without the benefit of checks to hide the fraudulent conversion of the mortgage note from which it issues the check, the Respondents fraud would be exposed. Federal Reserve notes are the only money called legal tender. If only Federal Reserve notes are deposited for credit and if the Respondents wrote a check for the mortgage note, the check then transfers Federal Reserve notes and the Respondents gives the borrower Respondents asset. There is no increase in the check book money supply that exists in the loan process. The Respondents policy is to increase Respondents liabilities by the mortgage note. If the mortgage note is money, then the Respondents never gave up any of Respondents asset. The Respondents simply used fraudulent conversion of ownership of the mortgage note. The Respondents cannot own the mortgage note until the Respondents fulfills the contract.
12. The check is not the money; the money is the deposit that makes the check good. In this case, the mortgage note is the money from which the check was issued. Who owned the mortgage note when the mortgage note was deposited? The borrowers owned the mortgage note because the Respondents never paid money for the mortgage note and never loaned money (Respondents asset). The Respondents simply claimed the Respondents owned the mortgage without paying for it and deposited the mortgage note from which the check was issued. This was fraudulent conversion. The Respondents risked nothing. Not even one penny was invested. They never took money out of any account, in order to own the mortgage note, as proven by the bookkeeping entries, financial ratios, the balance sheet, and of course the Respondents literature. The Respondents simply never complied with the contract.
13. If the mortgage note is not money, then the check is check kiting and the Respondents is insolvent and the Respondents still never paid. If the mortgage note is money, the Respondents took the borrowers money without showing the deposit, and without paying for it, which is fraudulent conversion. The Respondents claimed it owned the mortgage note without paying for it, then sold the mortgage note, took the cash and never used the cash to pay the liability it owned for the check the Respondents issued. The liability means that the Respondents still owes the money. The Respondents must return the mortgage note or the cash it received in the sale, in order to pay the liability. Even if the Respondents did this, the Respondents still never loaned the borrowers the Respondents money, which is what loan means. The check is not the money but merely an order to pay money. If the mortgage note is money then the Respondents must pay the check by returning the mortgage note. The check issued could only be redeemed in Federal Reserve notes, which the Respondents obtained by selling the mortgage note that they paid nothing for. This is fraudulent conversion making the contract, which the Respondents created with their policy of bookkeeping entries, illegal and the alleged contract null and void. The Respondents has no right to the mortgage note or to a lien on any property, until the Respondents performs under the contract.
14. All of the officials and agents, the Respondents, upheld the fraudulent conversion of the mortgage note and the subsequent threat of foreclosure. All dealt with fraudulent documents by the US Mail. All did not perform in their jobs as per the public trust, and all are liable in their job capacity as well as their private individual capacity. Therefore, all their jobs are in jeopardy, all their retirement and benefits are in jeopardy because of damage to me, petitioner and criminal racketeering.
15. Damages exist in that the Respondents refused to loan their money to RALPH K. EVANS Copyright and REBECCA H. EVANS. The Respondents denies us the issuer s equal protection under the law and contract, by merely exchanging one currency for another and refusing repayment in the same type of currency deposited. The Respondents refused to fulfill the contract by not loaning the money, and by the Respondents refusing to be repaid in the same currency, which they deposited as an exchange for another currency. A debt tender offered and refused is a debt paid to the extent of the offer. The Respondents has not authorization to alter the alleged contract and to refuse to perform by not loaning money, by changing the currency and then refusing repayment in what the Respondents has a written policy to deposit.
Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration
PERTAINING TO PUBLIC FRAUD, LAW, MONEY
AND COMMERCIAL LIENS
1. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court Decisions were based upon what is termed: Public Law or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. After 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court Decisions are based on Public Policy concerning commercial transactions made under the negotiable Instrument Law, as a result of the U.S. Bankruptcy Executive as declared by President Roosevelt on March 9, 1933 and codified at 12 U.S.C.A 95a. and by Executive Orders. This Bankruptcy caused the change from Public Law to Private Commercial Law and was recognized by the UNITED STATES Supreme Court in Erie v. Tompkins (1938). After that case, all the procedures of Law were officially blended with procedures of Equity.
2. The Negotiable Instruments Law is a branch of the international Law Merchant, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, (UCC) that was drafted and made uniform, and adopted in whole or substantially by all commercial states. Black s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition- page 1531. Thus the several commercial states were and are bound into commercial agreements to the federal commercial United States under the Uniform Commercial Code.
3. The several (now 50) commercial States accepted the benefits of federal grants offered by the Federal commercial United States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between themselves. Under the agreement the commercial States (Conference of Governors, March 6, 1933) pledged their full faith and credit and agreed to obey the dictates of the commercial Congress, and assume their portion of the national Debt, collected as your fair share, as an example, in the nature of the unlawful income tax, wherein the IRS operates and collects such taxes under the same UCC.
4. This system of Negotiable paper has bound all commercial corporate entities (cities, municipalities, counties, etc.) of government together to the process/system of the Commercial Venue of Commercial Law as expressed and exercised within the Commercial Lien Process. This nationwide Commercial bond also altered the original (law) status of the Court to nothing more than administrative tribunals merely administering the Respondents bankruptcy (private policy) of debt collection for the Creditors.
5. By and through the Respondents bankruptcy, the UCC, and other acts, commercial Congress in failing to uphold its constitutional duty to provide a lawful medium of exchange (i.e., money backed by silver and gold, or minted coin pursuant to Article 1, section 8, clause 5) have by these various Acts created an abundance of this new type of money called currency commercial credit money to circulate within the Legislative democracy called the commercial United States...of which they are not bound by Constitutional law and limitation.
6. The Commercial Law Venue, compelled upon the people a forced benefit of limited liability for the payment of debt by the use of Federal Reserve notes (debt instruments) where YOUR debts are only discharged, (not paid) in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instruments(Federal Reserve notes, etc.). There is a distinction between a debt discharged and one paid. When discharged the debt still exists, though divested of its character as a legal obligation. Stanek v. White, 215 NWR 781 (1927). Federal Reserve notes are only evidence of debt owed to the Federal Reserve and Federal Reserve Notes are a commercial line on the Federal Reserve banks.
7. Since 1933, by the acts of the bankruptcy and the UCC, the Law has been tainted, or colored, (I.E., color of law) as it were, because the commercial law is operated in conjunction with the Negotiable Instruments Law, wherein the commercial Federal Government by and through the Respondents, can/have declared that a piece of paper has and represent value. Albeit that there is no substance (gold or silver)backing the piece of paper, which the Federal Reserve of Chicago in its publication Modern Money Mechanics, page 3, has in fact declared the use of these debt instruments (Federal Reserve notes) a confidence) game. The substance of the law (property) (I.E. gold, silver, etc.) has been removed, like the substance that is the basis of U.S.A., by and through the UCC, all contracts, agreements, (implied, or otherwise, etc.), applications, permits, etc. where the colorable consideration (Federal Reserve notes) was passed in those contracts, etc., all such contract are then also colored and are not genuine, for no lawful consideration (gold or silver)was paid by either party to the contract to, by Law, pass both the possession and the property to the lawful Buyer. See - Bouviers Dict. Of Law, 1839, TITLE, definition #5. The lawful coin of the United States will pass the property along with the possession.
8. Today, all our courts (sic) sit as Non-Constitutional-Non Article III-Commercial Legislative Tribunals administering the Respondents bankruptcy through their statutes which are in reality commercial obligations for the BENEFIT OR PRIVILEGE OF DISCHARGING YOUR DEBTS WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE MONOPOLY COLORABLE MONEY NOTES.
9. Under the current colorable legal system, the de-facto (we just do it) legislature has created colorable rights called privileges, imposes, duties, lays down rules of conduct, and the commercial legislative tribunals declare the same as rights. These privileges are granted and given upon the peoples voluntary act of asking permission, then upon providing any colorable consideration (payment = discharge) the people then come under the administrative jurisdiction of Commercial Law.
10. Today in AMERICA, everyone, all governments included, are commercial statutory law merchants dealing in commercial negotiable paper (instruments) under the UCC for the limited liability for the discharge of debts, wherein a debt remains (fraud) and nothing else. The so-called judges are operating only a commercial tribunal to administer their corporate regulations concerning all financial transactions.....both voluntary and those compelled.
11. ALL DEBTS are satisfied by one or both of two ways, a payment, or a promise to pay. Every payment is by substance, and every promise to pay is accomplished by a commercial currency or commercial paper which is technically known as commercial lien. The satisfaction of the debt by providing substance is called paying the debt. The satisfaction of the debt by a written or printed promise to pay the debt is called discharging the debt. All debts are paid by substance. All debts are only discharged by COMMERCIAL CURRENCY, COMMERCIAL POCKET MONEY NOTES, OR OTHER COMMERCIAL LIENS (Negotiable instrument, i.e., Commercial Lien Security/Asset, i.e., UCC-1 Asset).
12. All paper money consists of COMMERCIAL NOTES which declare a debt or obligation and which promise or demand payment. All such evidences of debt or obligations are technically known as COMMERCIAL LIENS. Such notes include currency, for example, Federal Reserve notes, checks, drafts, conditional checks, notes of exchange (paper money/instruments between Parties).
13. A Federal Reserve note is a commercial lien on the Federal Reserve and Respondents. A personal check is a commercial lien on the account of the maker of the check (cheque). A draft is a check (cheque) with a conditional agreement printed above the place of endorsement on the backside of the draft. A note of exchange is a commercial lien between the Parties consisting of one Party demanding payment (discharge) from another Party. A personal check (cheque), while passing from account to account, as a note of exchange is a commercial lien.
14. Banking accounts are backed (supported) either by substance money or by paper money, or by both. The substance money is called collateral. The paper money can be currency (for example, paper money notes), a loan of credit from the Respondents, or checks or other paper money as such, are commercial liens, received from other sources. Therefore the property declared/pledge or claimed to secure the obligation, and damages, is the collateral by and through the Commercial Lien process, which establishes (creates) the credit called commercial credit money.
15. Valid credit currency (commercial lien) can be established by making a valid claim of debt (based on a damage or injury) by an declaration/affidavit in the form of a private security agreement (and other related documents) and by allowing the lien to mature in three (3) months (90 days) into an accounts receivable (under commercial law) by the failure of the lien debtor to contest the agreement/lien by answering or rebutting, by his Declaration/affidavit, on a point for point basis.
16. A lien must contain 1(the names of the party/parties, claimants, and debtors; 2) an affidavit stating the events which created the obligations; 3) a ledger giving a one-to-one correspondence between events and their values; 4) a list of property pledged or claimed to secure the payment (discharge) of the obligations, and 5) any evidence of exhibits in support of the claims made against the debtor.
17. The primary method of establishing a COMMERCIAL LIEN currency/paper/negotiable instrument is to come, 1) a promise to perform; 2) a claim of breach/damage/injury/fraud, etc., and 3) a three month (90 day) default to challenge or rebut the claim/lien on said point for point basis.
18. Commercial Lien/value/currency can be in the form of a Parties check (cheque), a draft, a UCC 1 Security, and its partial assignments....that pass, and are accepted, or circulate as credit money.
19. The people, operating in their private capacity, by and through the remedy provided in the Uniform Commercial Code, pursuant to their collective sovereign capacity, upon injury or damage, may as a matter or right, proceed to utilize the Commercial Law venue against the agents of governments, their creations (corporations) and its officers (accountability = liability) to arrive at the truth and secure damages by the Commercial Lien process (to create and establish the damages in the form of UCC money, i.e., a security, an asset, and liability) supported by the full faith and credit of the United States Federal Government under the Commercial Law and the UCC....America s Federal (and State) Common Law.
20. In the Commercial Venue, TRUTH is sovereign and the sovereign must always tell the TRUTH.
Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
1. This serves as notice to the court, and all officers of the court, and all other public servants, and all other people and persons that are working for, or on behalf of any public trust corporation, that Ralph-Kenneth: Evans and Rebecca H. Evans, know that we have Rights that we can demand to have protected at all times, both by the court and the police departments who follow its policies. This document serves as notice that we hereby reserve all our rights without prejudice and order all courts and related people and persons to recognize, honor, and protect All Our Rights, both today, and forever, as is in accordance with the Constitutions. Furthermore a Quo Warranto is placed upon all actions that are taken against us that might cause us legal disability, be it now or at any time in the future.
2. This is official notice that we Reserve All Our Rights Without Prejudice. We refuse this or any other court, public servant or person, the Right to take any liberties with our rights. We do not consent in any way to have our rights infringed upon. We do not give permission to construe anything we say or do as permission to Prejudice any of our Rights. Any lack of knowledge of the Law on our part at this time relating to Our Rights shall not be construed as permission to take any liberties with any of our Rights. Before Creator God, we make and proclaim this statement of Our Reservation of Rights as fact and order all public service people and persons to abide by it.
3. Any infringement upon our Rights shall serve as prima facie evidence of Intent to Violate the Law and as a threat of violence. If any action is taken against us that cause us a disability and it is later determined that said actions, lack thereof, or any part thereof, are based on policy and not Law, this document shall serve as prima facie evidence of intent to willfully violate the Law. Each violation of our Rights shall create a separate claim for damages, which shall be deemed immediately due and payable to the injured party.
4. Administrative laws relevant to rights violation by public servants include simulating legal process. (1) A person commits the crime of simulating legal process if the person knowingly issues or delivers to another person any document that in form and substance falsely simulates civil or criminal process. (a) Civil or criminal process means a document or order, including, but not limited to, a summons, lien, fraudulent deed, complaint, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading or subpoena, that is issued by a court or that is filed or recorded for the purpose of: (A) Exercising jurisdiction; (B) Representing a claim against a person or property; (C) Directing a person to appear before a court or tribunal; or (D) Directing persons to perform or refrain from performing a specified act. (b) Person has the meaning given except that in relation to a defendant; person means a human being, a public or private corporation, an unincorporated association, or a partnership. (3) Simulating legal process: (a) A public servant commits the crime of official misconduct in the first degree if with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another; (a) The public servant knowingly fails to perform a duty imposed upon the public servant by Law or one clearly inherent in the nature of office; or (b) The public servant knowingly performs an act constituting an unauthorized exercise in official duties. (2) Official misconduct All officers of the court and peace officers, such as the sheriff and deputies and all municipal private peace officers, such as all people hired for that purpose by a public corporation, such as City and State Police, are deemed to have a duty to know and uphold the law and protect the rights of the people around them.
5. The Respondent have simulated legal processes against me, Ralph-Kenneth: Evans , Rebecca Harrell: Evans and the private copyrighted property of Ralph-Kenneth: Evans known as RALPH K. EVANS and REBECCA H. EVANS, all based on the fraudulent document and processes of the Respondents. In so doing they have caused spurious liens to be filed against my private property. They have knowingly performed official misconduct in their official capacities. When it was their duty to know and uphold the law and protect my rights. The Respondents issued and delivered documents that in form and substance falsely simulated civil and/or criminal process.
6. The Respondents have and are violating my Rights by aiding others that have and are violating our rights and have and are acting in collusion with Public Servant Who Has the Legal Duty and Power to Protect Those Rights Such crime shall serve as prima facie evidence that said Public Servants did intend to, and created claims on behalf of the other Respondents. The Very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. Ones right to life, liberty and property, to free speech, free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. Qualified immunity defense fails of public officer violates clearly established right, because a reasonably competent official should know Law governing this conduct.
7. Rights are neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his Rights, nor to the one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can only be retained by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by belligerent claimants in person. All Rights Reserved: When we use Without Prejudice UCC 1-207 in connection with our signatures, we are saying: We reserve our right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that we did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, we do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement. The Sufficiency of the Reservation: any expression indicating an intention to reserve rights is sufficient, such as All Rights Reserved. The making of a valid Reservation of Right reserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such right by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel.
8. This Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration is in Law, and Must Be Adjudicated by Law. Any and All Public Servants Who Have Taken an Oath to Uphold the constitutions of the state and the united States but shall not be avoided for lack of an oath. Further, Authorities: Whereas, the exercise of a natural right needs no authority in Texas other than the Constitution.
9. We reserve all rights given us by God and protected by the Constitution for the Republican Union, and the republic and a state called Texas which places definite and unbridgeable limits upon the law making and enforcement abilities of any government body or corporate entity operating in accordance with and under color of American Law.
10. If the Respondents attempt to rebut this Declaration by me, I, reserve and exercise my sovereign power to demand that the Respondents provide full disclosure of the source of the authority and the principal they are acting under and for upon which all actions were taken. Full disclosure means: absolute in detail from its source.
11. Under American Law, I, me, recognize that codes, rules and statutes are only administrative in nature and are not the actual Constitutional Laws with proper enacting clauses. Such codes, rules and statutes, as applied as mandatory obligatory conditions to me in which I am placed under a legal disability over my objection, or through fraud and deception, are acts of slavery.
12. I, me, object to, and reserve the Right not to be subjected to slavery and reserve all Lawful Rights of redress for any act of slavery imposed upon my body, labor and/or other properties.
13. I, Further declare: the county Judge and county Commissioners of Dallas, Texas refuses to convene the court of record and bring this to trial disclose to me what system of law other than the Constitutional Common Law in which Ralph-Kenneth: Evans have Rights secure in the Bill of Rights , are they operating under.
A. Exactly the system of law the Respondents, are operating under.
B. How that system of law(s) applies to me, who understand himself to be a Man with all the Rights given to me by God and protected by the Constitutions for the republic and Texas a commercial STATE.
14. I, me further remind the commissioners the Judge of the county court of record of the county of Dallas that pursuant to law, actors engaged in any form of slavery lose all immunities from criminal prosecution and civil judgments, and any corporation, municipal or otherwise, that condones any act of slavery by any of its agents or employees or the Respondents is subject to civil and criminal judgments under the law.
15. Relief demanded: I Ralph-Kenneth: Evans Declare the jury is to determine the facts and the law as in other cases. The jury is to assess the penalties both civil and criminal.
Executed pursuant to title 28 USC 1746 (1)
by____________________________________________ this 21st day of February 2004.
Before me, the undersigned officer in and for said county and state, personally appeared Ralph-Kenneth: Evans , known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the man who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes contained there of his own free will..
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal this ________day of ___________, 2004.
___________________________________________
All replies must be sent to: Notary Public 3352 Broadway Blvd. # 504 Garland, Texas 75043
[Full Disclosure N-D Posted March 3, 2004]
RONALD E. SHULTS, CFE
Vice President and Director of Security
Guaranty Bank
8333 Douglas Avenue
Dallas, TX 75225
Commerce operates in truth demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date February 25, 2004. Equality is paramount and mandatory by law.
Notice and demand for full disclosure
Dear RONALD E. SHULTS, CFE and Esquire Caroline Jones
You, RONALD E. SHULTS, CFE have noticed me to send all such responses to you. Therefore in the matter of the letter signed by Caroline C. Jones your third party debt collector stating that I the living man and not the fiction RALPH K. EVANS owed the debt in the matter of your claim number 890143 of a balance owed in the amount of 127,952.10 which I assume includes a late charge for the refused payment and the secondary P&I amount of 308.20. Therefore from your papers the alleged statement of the account owed by me for the Fictions is 127,952.10 plus 308.20 for a total amount of 128,260.30 or is your statement false and misleading. If so I again demand to know pursuant to my right to know the amount of the debt what the debt is denominated in and where can the payment be delivered and the original present day note and title be pickup by us.
You informed me the note is in a vault in Austin and I offered to take the funds to Austin and pick up the note and you refused to allow me settlement or delivery of said note to me.
I then made an agreement with third parties and gave them authority as my assigns to make settlement with you on my behalf you also refuse settlement with them obstructing my right to private contract with other parties for a private venture using said property.
It is evident from your refusal of settlement that it is your intent to hold me and my private property (that was discharge to me by the Supreme Court of Texas) in bondage to an alleged 8% note in a 4% market.
I demand to know per my right to know the following:
Who is the principal you represent?
What law are you operating under?
What government are you operating under?
To whom is the alleged debt owed?
Where did the funds come from that created the debt?
Who and how were the funds created for the loan that created the debt/note?
Do you have any knowledge of any criminal conversion of title or theft of signature on any of the documents or any fraudulent certification of signatures on any of the documents that created the deed of trust or the note?
Provide me the license number of all parties involved in said deed/loan/debt/note.
Provide me a copy of the bond the name and mailing location of the bonding agent(s) of all parties involved in said loan/debt/note.
Name all signers of the said note that created the loan/debt./note.
What property or person is the security for said note?
Is the security for said note me or is it a commercial address or a public address is it land and improvements or is it a fiction?
Is the security for said note different then the beneficiary? If so name both parties.
Is the property secured by the note real or is it a fictional property?
Is the deed of trust that secures the note on real property or is it on public property or on commercial property or a fictional property?
Have you taken any funds from the trust account (escrow account) to pay taxes?
If so, do you have a lawful tax assessment and who was the assessor?
Has there been any misrepresentation in this transaction, if so by whom?
Are you holding any bonds issued by me for discharge of said note by me?
Have you processed any bond issued by me either through the Comptroller for Texas or the treasury window Washington, if not why not?
Send this information to me immediately so we may reach settlement and closure.
RONALD E. SHULTS, CFE and Esquire Caroline Jones I am sending a copy of this discovery to the county Judge and county Commissioners of Dallas, Texas and if you fail to answer as in the past I will ask them to issue an order ordering you to answer. The fraud stops now.
Ralph-Kenneth: Evans
CC: Caroline Jones
county Judge and county Commissioners of Dallas, Texas
[Misc Property Tax Letters Posted March 8, 2004]
To: Frank Elliott Gilmer County Tax Commissioner March 1, 2004
PO Box 361
Ellijay, Ga. 30540-0005
Frank Elliot
You have again failed to include the check as previous; therefore I send you a bond to discharge the tax debt without a lawful assessment for the taxes you claimed were owed by the fiction EVANS RALPH K. on my Ralph: Evans' land so as not to cause a controversy. You failed to apply the bond to the tax for the fiction or return it making the taking of said bond theft of credit. It is understood by me that the only thing you will accept for the debt of the fiction is private funds from me or you will take my property under the color of law. Therefore I must pay you the extortion until such time as we can restore our courts. When and if we get our court restored you are given notice you will be extradited to Texas and tried for crimes against the people of Texas. A crime committed against the people of the county of Dallas from persons outside of the county is a crime in the county. You have previously used terrorist threats to extort funds from me using the deceptive similar name RALPH K. EVANS. You have and are using my land to hold me in bondage and extort credit from me using a fraudulent title.
The check in credit is enclosed and when cashed will be all the evidence to charge you with a felon by the use of the U.S. Mail.
Executed pursuant to the laws of the united States of America and reserving all my rights this 1st day of March 2004 Ralph: Evans
End of letter 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Texas Land Office
Commissioner Jerry Patterson
Stephen F. Austin Building
1700 North Congress Avenue
Austin, Texas federal Zone 78711-2873 March 1, 2004
Jerry Patterson
Re: letter dated February 24, 2004 alleged answer for records request signed by the Crown's agent Esquire Noelle C. Letteri General Counsel Team for the Crown's Texas General Land Office.
(Copy attached)
Jerry Patterson why have you refuse to answer? Why have I received this alleged answer form an agent of the Crown? Has all the land of the people and veterans of Texas been turned over to the Crown? Have you Given power of attorney of your office over to the Crown and the crown's agents? Why is the Crown through its agent's criminal converting the title to the land and the title of people within Texas into fictions and commercial or public properties?
You Jerry Patterson and the Crown and the Crown's agent should know and should have known that Funds in the Texas Veterans land Fund cannot be used to funds loans on Public or Commercial property or for any said named Actors.
Therefore this gives you notice that I Ralph-Kenneth: Evans a man, living soul, give you notice this date I remove my signature from all documents that you have in you procession or exist in any files or records that has any name on them other then my title: Ralph-Kenneth or Ralph: or documents that I did not created. The removal is effective back to the creation of said documents for said fictions.
Noelle C. Letteri you failed to include the check, or your license number, or name and location of your bonding company/agents.
I Ralph-Kenneth a man reserve all my rights under original jurisdiction and laws of Texas.
My verified civil and criminal complaint under original jurisdiction and law is still in force and full effect for restitution in this matter.
Ralph-Kenneth: family of Evans sovereign man, a living soul and not an ACTOR, or any other deceptive similar name or title. Therefore all funds issued to fund any loans for and to any and all actors must be return immediately to me and the Texas Veteran Fund.
This document and notice is served by fax, election mail and by first class mail this date: March 1, 2004 to you Jerry Patterson, The Crown and all the Crown's Agents by me.
Ralph-Kenneth
End of letter 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
for Payment per order May 18, 20xx
I, Monica McCoy-Purty officer of the court of the State of Texas received from addressee Ralph, evans .08 per my order to pay Tax Debt so he may avoid the taking of his land located in Rockwall county, Texas. The payment was made as follows:
1. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AB90195645B
2. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AC71298643A
3. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AL45566823B
4. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK04459764A
5. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AA03170497A
6. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK65409038A
7. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK65769077A
8. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AB41954226A
9. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AE30226438A
10. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AD24466710A
11. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AF35166405A
12. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK65862013A
13. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AC70434495A
14. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK12691820A
15. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK50678302A
16. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK65746771A
17. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number ZB02935311E
18. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK27460003A
19. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK65518949A
20. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AD24538633A
21. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AB16218164C
22. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK28940854A
23. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AJ05426132A
24. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AL05453087A
25. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AJ28406170A
26. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK02949848A
27. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AB26769609A
28. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AA02592788A
29. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK37220493A
30. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK50476256A
31. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AB31736467C
32. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AB75289432A
33. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AE02616926A
34. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK26128124A
35. 50 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE serial number AK08609052A
Total 1750.00 Dollars of the United States of America.
Received by, ______________________
License Number ______________________
Location 2323 Bryan Street
Suite 1720
Dallas, Texas
Certified By Notary _______________________ Seal
Date: 5/ /00
End of letter 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[Are You Brain Dead Posted March 8, 2004]
NOTICE TO ALL THAT STILL GIVES A DAMN AND THAT IS NOT OVERCOME
WITH STUPIDITY AND NOT BRAIN DEAD WITH A ZERO LEARNING CURVE
TO: all ye concerned
It has become plain by evidence and action that:
The way that the controllers and their minion are going to implement the take over of earth as well as Texas is with a number, Social Security Number, Drivers License, STATE I.D. etc. It is not the number that is going to do you in; it is the name associated with that number. The name is a CAPITAL LETTER NAME, not a Christian name; it is a legal fiction name or a corporate name or also known as a vessel name. It is alleged to be issued by the State or the united States, but it is not. It is issued by a U.N. Corporation, either THE STATE OR THE UNITED STATES OR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, all U.N. CORPORATIONS. When you sign it with your Christian name you have just changed your status from "another" to an "actor". What I mean by that is you have just agreed you are either a CORPORATION OF THE U.N. or a VESSEL OF THE U. N. You have just signed all you rights over to the STATE a.k.a. U.N. for the privilege of being a U.N. subject.
At present you can not open a bank account or do any business with a U.N. Bank without that card that says you are a CAPITAL LETTER PERSON however created. It won't be very long until you will not be able to do any business without a signed I.D., signed by you with your Christian name claiming you are the CAPITAL LETTER FICTION. You will not get an I.D. from any of the above CORPORATIONS in your upper and lower lettered spelled name. It will only be issued to you in CAPITAL LETTERS and it will require your signature on it. Once you put your signature on it you can deny until the Cows come home that you are not the fiction but it will not do you any good. You signed that you were IT and they keep records; so look through your documents! How many do you have with your signature that you have signed stating you are IT, the CAPITAL LETTER PERSON?
You learned men may claim that this is not true. Therefore, I issue you this challenge! Go try it prove me wrong. I have been there and done that; now it is your turn for an awaking to the real truth.
The truth there is no State or united States Government! All the offices stand vacant. There are Corporations and members of the Corporation impersonating the government to deceive you, such as your alleged president, your alleged congress and senate, and your state officials, including but not limited to your local cities and counties. I say again all the offices are vacant and it is up to each and every one of you to see that they are filled. If you want OUT of the Satanic System your very soul may depend on you coming out of IT..
P. S. They control the currency today. Tomorrow it will be the food and the next it will be the water. You will be unable to do anything in the public domain or even survive your very life unless you lie and claim to be a fiction and deny your creator. So we are left with two choices LIE OR DIE.
[Criminal Complaint Recorded March 15, 2003 Posted March19, 2004]
Note: Original copy is available on our CD
SECOND and amended petition for
Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit of truth. Presented by me the undersigned addressee, Daniel: Boudreau, one of we the People, of the several counties within one of the several united States pursuant original common law jurisdiction. This being a matter involving a matter over twenty-one united States of America dollars in silver specie. Demand is made for trial by jury by law in the county court of record (the Federal Constitution Article 1 Section 8 cl. 8 supreme Court) of the County of Dallas, Texas pursuant to the original law and original jurisdiction as mandated by the original Constitution and by Article 1 of Sec. 8, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 29, Article 5 Sec.15, 16, 17, and 29 of the STATES CORPORATE CHARTER known as TEXAS CONSTITUTION.
Notice: EQUALITY IS PARAMOUNT AND MANDATORY BY LAW and demand is made for all parties to give full disclosure at all times, failure to give full disclosure at all times by any party will constitute fraud by the non-disclosing party.
Daniel: Boudreau, living soul
Petitioner Docket number_______________
By the law of the land common law and
v. petition for trial by jury by law.
In the supreme court of and for the people
of the county of Dallas, Texas
Jacques S. Jaikaran
Fred F. Edwards
Attorney Eric Bulldog Yollick
Bank President James V. Lindsey
Bank Vice president Brenda Sanders
Bank Attorney Gary Vodika
Receiver Forester
Court reporter and
Court Clerks
Respondents
Under the Laws of the Republic of Texas the peoples Declaration of Rights preserved by the Laws of the State of Texas Article one of the 1876 Constitution for the State of Texas as published in the 2003 edition. All Bar Card Attorneys a.k.a. Esquires agents of the Crown are herein recused unless a Respondent.
Republic of and one of the pursuant to Texas Rules of civil Procedure 53. several united States signed and seal
Texas in the Court of Common-Law Pleas
county of Dallas
This court has Original Jurisdiction under the above entitled heading (law of the land the rules of Common Law) the county of Dallas is the proper venue all of the crime victims are inhabitants are within the jurisdiction of the county of Dallas, Texas. All Bar Card Attorneys a.k.a. Esquires agents of the Crown are herein rescued unless a Respondent.
I, me the undersigned one of, we the People, Sovereigns, living souls, the posterity, born upon the land, in the one of several counties within the one of the several States united of America. I, me, the undersigned Posterity, Creditors, Claimants, and Secured Parties, (hereinafter Secured Party, I, myself, me, ) does hereby solemnly declare, say, and state:
1. I, me, the Secured Party competent to state the matters set forth herewith.
2. Secured Party has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
3. All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if testifying I, me, the Secured Party shall so state.
Plain Statement of Facts by declaration.
A matter must be expressed to be resolve. In commerce truth is sovereign. Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. An unrebutted Affidavit stands as Truth in commerce. An unrebutted Affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce. An Affidavit of Truth, under commercial law, can only be satisfied: by a rebuttal Affidavit of truth, by payment, by agreement, by resolution by a jury according to the rules of Common Law.
I, me, me the Secured Party am expressing truth by this Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit of truth in commerce. Presented by me the undersigned addressee Daniel: Boudreau.
WHEREAS, the public record is the highest form of evidence, I me, one of the Secured Party is hereby timely creating public record by Declaration with this Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit of truth in commerce. Presented by me the undersigned addressee Daniel: Boudreau.
For: Willful, corruptly, knowingly, by arbitrary and caprices acts, with certain exchange of consideration for Libel, with dolus malus, misapplication of corporation statute upon a man, causing crimes against a man by agents Court of the Crown with title of nobility of Esquire violating the terms and conditions of the Corporate Policy and Procedures and the Substantive Rights of me the Secured Party and Petitioner. In violation of federal law: The Reseatment Act of March 30, 1870, Hobbs Act 18 U.S.C. Section 1951, 42 USC 1981, 28 USC 1332 ( a), (4),( c) (1), copyright Act 17 USC 102, 302, 502, 18 USC 2319 and Article 1 Section 12, 15, 19 and 29 the Texas Constitution of 1876, the organic Law of the Land of Texas.
I, me, the undersigned, the Secured Party, hereby make this Declaration for Civil and Criminal Complaint in the nature of an affidavit for and on the behalf as myself. I hereby Declare and certify under the Federal law Title 28 USC 1746 (1) and Federal Public Law 97-280, 96 Stat 1211 and James 5: 12 when there is no conflict, I declare I am over the age of twenty-one, of good moral character, have firsthand knowledge, and am competent to testify to the following facts. The facts stated herein are true, correct, complete and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief, and show the following:
I declare that the Hierarchy of Law which applies to this matter as understood by me is the Constitution for the united States of America, the Bill of Rights, Statutes at Large of the united States of America, the Constitution for Texas of 1876 and 1836, and statutes as those statutes apply to a man and not a corporations in Texas. Of particular note in the Constitution for Texas Article 1, Sections 1 through 31 commonly referred to as the Texas Bill of Rights. Article 1, Section 29 specifically exempts living souls from the application of legislative corporation statute when said statute conflicts with the Constitution for Texas. Also particularly noteworthy and applicable to this matter is Constitution for Texas, Article 5. Sec. 17, wherein all civil and criminal cases mandated to be certified to the county Courts of record for trial under/by the law of the land. This right shall not be divested Constitution for Texas, Art. 1 Sec. 29, and my substantive rights are preserved by Federal law title 28 USC Section 2072 (b) and forever inviolate.
History of crimes in this cause
Respondent Jacques S. Jaikaran and I entered into an agreement under the 7th amendment of the Constitution of the United States or America (Federal Constitution) in silver specie over twenty dollars. We agreed any dispute would be tried and settled pursuant to the 7th amendment. Jacques S. Jaikaran refused and failed to complete the contract as agreed for funding his part of the agreement in the required specie and other agreed upon performance. In July of 2003 we agreed that there was no contract and that we would dissolve the relationship. Then Jaikaran immediately formed d/b/a(s) for his self and diverted funds due and owing to Texas Spine Medical Centers into a private account without any agreement with Texas Spine Medical Centers or me. As soon as this was discovered, Jaikaran was stealing the accounts receivable, Jaikaran was immediately fired for theft of funds and ordered to vacate the clinic. Jaikaran instead hired an attorney Yollick and Yollick immediately filed a law suite without notice in the fictional name of JACQUES S. JAIKARAN (who has been declare by a federal Court to be a bankrupt and a tax cheat), against a fictional name of DANIEL A. BOUDREAU a deceptive similar name to me Daniel: Boudreau. The names on the contract were Jacques S. Jaikaran and Daniel-A Boudreau and not JACQUES S. JAIKARAN and DANIEL A. BOUDREAU. Bulldog Yollick criminally converted the names to give his-self and the Court jurisdiction of the fictional entities. Me and another gave witness by oral and written testimony of this fact and it was ignored by the Court and the Court allegedly rule that my witness in this matter was of no legal effect leaving and denying the Defendant without witness and without counsel.
Officer Fred F. Edwards ( Judge ) Respondent made a ruling from chambers to turn the clinic over to Respondents Jaikaran and his hired a attorney Yollick even after he told Jaikaran in open chambers and should be on the record that he Jaikaran did not perform to the obligation and his duty pursuant to the contract and was in breach of said contract. That should have ended the matter then and there. Instead Fred F. Edwards made another ruling from chambers to turn the Clinic over to Yollick, Jaikaran and appoint another attorney to act as receiver. The clinic was turned over to Yollick and Jaikaran and the other officer of the court. Jaikaran and the other officers of the court used the authority of the court to steal the accounts receivable (of over 600,000.00 dollars) belonging to Texas Spine Medical centers. The amount stolen is estimated be over 600,000.00 dollars and this amount is unaccounted for to the owners and creditors of Texas Spine and Medical Centers as of this date. The accounts receivable due and owing the clinic located in Montgomery County were stolen by the terrorist using the color of law and the authority of the Court they then fired all the employees and stopped the patients treatment closed the clinic, un-installed all the equipment packed it up and locked the doors and left the remainder of a five year lease still owing. It is believed that Jaikaran planed to come back and steal all the equipment and move it to another location and again use the Court to enforce his theft. Then Yollick and Jaikaran went back to the chambers of Fred Edwards (exparte) and asked him to use his office and the authority of the Court to award the amount that was stolen by Jaikaran and the attorneys officers of the Court to cover up the theft of the accounts receivable due and owing to the owners and creditors of the clinic.
It appears the amount asked for was doubled by use of the authority of the court in order to divert suspicion from the stolen funds. Then Yollick immediately entered an abstract of judgment against the Fictional Defendant into the county records and again attempted another criminal conversion of the names from defendant DANIEL A. BOUDREAU to my similar name Daniel-A Boudreau. Then Yollick and Jaikaran using the fraudulent abstract went again back to Fred F Edwards chambers (Exparte) and had him use his office and had him again to issue another restraining order and again using a fictional plaintiff and a fictional defendant then the unsigned order was send to the Mesquite Bank and ordered the bank to hold all funds in all accounts that I, Daniel: Boudreau, a living man, was signor on regardless of ownership, another unsigned order that alleged to order to hold funds to some unclear date in the future. Again it is plain from the facts the officers of the Court meet again in the chambers of Fred F. Edwards chambers and have another exparte (there being no defendant to object) meeting and then ordered officers of the First State Bank Mesquite to hold all the funds in the accounts to which I, Daniel: Boudreau, is a signor on. The Bank officers were informed that the order was an illegal order, the Banks officer Vice president, Brenda Sanders, was ask to call in the Bank examiners to investigate this matter from its inception, she refused causing the clinic loss to access to its funds and leaving no choice but to stop patients treatment and put 32 employees out of a jobs. All the above proceedings have been done against a fictional defendant using a federal court declared bankrupt tax cheat Plaintiff and without council for the fictional defendant under color of law.
All the Respondents the officers of the Court, the officers of the Bank and Jacques S. Jaikaran have acted unlawful, illegally and totally unreasonable to restrain the business and trade of Texas Spine Medical Centers, to again steal more funds (belonging to the clinic that that is use for operations of the clinics) for the self enrichment of Jacques S. Jaikaran and the officers of the Court leaving the clinics employees out of a job and the patients without treatment that they have contracted for and destroying the business of all the clinics and stealing all the capitol for their self enrichment using the authority of the Court unlawfully and illegally.
This matter from the beginning was a private agreement between two living men, me and Jacques S. Jaikaran, there were no other parties or entities involved in the agreement except a unfunded (which was never funded because of breach of agreement by Jaikaran) corporation named NATIONAL SPINE MEDICAL CENTERS INC. The owners and creditors refuse to allow me to involve the clinics known as Texas Spine Medical Clinics with the agreement between me and Jacques S. Jaikaran, other then to allow me to hire him Jacques S. Jaikaran, as an employee who I fired for theft of the clinic accounts receivable when it was discovered he was taking the funds and placing them in his private accounts.
There is no agreement or contract between JACQUES S. JAIKARAN and DANIEL A. BOUDREAU that I, Daniel: Boudreau, to which I have agreed to be the security.
Officers of the court in collusion with Jaikaran have taken over 600,000.00 dollars in accounts receivable owed to Texas Spine Medical Centers, took over the clinic, destroyed the business, laid the employees off and put them without work and left patients without medical attention and left debt owing of over 400,000.00 dollars and the remainder of a 5 year lease that I, Daniel Boudreau, must stand accountable for. The order to the bank has destroyed the other clinics and left 32 employees without a job and 68 patients without medical attention. The court transcript of the temporary hearing was falsified. I have witness that the judge knew and stated that Jaikaran failed to fulfill his duty under the obligation to the original contract and this matter should have ended there and then.
The original contract that Jaikaran failed to execute by refusing to put in one penny is recorded in the court records as is a copy of the abstract of judgment put in the county record in Montgomery County Texas against a fictional defendant showing that the officers of the Court criminally converted the names in order to secure judgment and steal over 600,000.00 dollars from the clinic located within Montgomery County, Texas. This money has vanished into someones pocket and has never been mentioned again in any of the following proceedings and is believed to be stolen by Jaikaran and the officers of the court.
I paid 275.00 dollars for a copy of the transcript of the hearing on Oct 24, 2003 when I received it was incomplete and inaccurate. When I asked for a copy of the tape recording of the hearing my request was refused.
Facts
Fact: I declare that I have suffered past and ongoing unlawful irreparable damage by Respondents. I have suffered libel of my reputation at the hands of Jacques S. Jaikaran and Eric Yollick, my ability for use of my talent was greatly hampered by the stigma (upon me) of their fraudulent testimony against me using a fraudulent Defendant and Plaintiff.
Fact: I declare that my and the clinics owners private property has been stolen by the Respondents and other Respondents have join in the cover up. This has been done by Eric Yollick using his occupational license, his personal influence and political influence with the judge of the 9th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas for divesting exclusive right to private and intellectual property without contract, without title, without assessment, and without due process, from me.
I, Daniel: Boudreau, bring before this court of record by declaration in the nature of an affidavit mandated by law, Article 5 Section 17 of the 1876 Texas Constitution, by charges of theft of currency, libel, slander, trespass, racketeering, restraint of trade and theft of private property against said Respondents,
Count 1
Fact: the Respondents have stolen from the Clinic located in Montgomery County, Texas well as over 600,000.00 dollars in accounts receivable belonging to me, the owners and creditors, they the Respondents are back again to steal all the funds in the accounts in the First State Bank Mesquite that I am a signor on, with the aid of the officers of the Bank.
Count 2
Fact: The medical equipment belonging to me, the owners and creditors, located in Montgomery County, Texas was stolen by the Respondents used, damaged and left for me to repair and reinstall at my cost, expense and time.
Count 3
Fact: The Respondents also stole the office equipment belonging to me, the owners and creditors, located in Montgomery County, Texas used it and left it for me to reinstall and repair.
Count 4
Fact: The clinic sign belonging to me, the owners and creditors, located in Montgomery County, Texas was used to treat patients under a different name then the name on the sign to cover-up the theft of the funds (accounts receivable).
Count 5
Fact: The Respondents stole the intellectual private property located in Montgomery County, Texas belonging to me, the owners and creditors,
Count 6
Fact: The Respondents stole the Proprietary property located in Montgomery County, Texas belonging to me, the owners and creditors.
Count 7
Fact: The Respondents stole the funds paid to the clinic located in Montgomery County, Texas, paid by patients belonging to the clinic procured by advertising that was paid by me.
Count 8
Fact: The Respondents stole the lease on the clinic located in Montgomery County, Texas belonging to me, the owners and creditors.
Count 9
Fact: The Respondents stole the private records belonging to me, the owners and creditors, located in Montgomery County, Texas, under threat of imprisonment.
Count 10
Fact: Respondents used said court to divest and denied, me, the owners and creditors, all property right and access to the clinic located in Montgomery County, Texas
Count 11
Fact: Respondents used said court to divest and deny, me, the owners and creditors, access to the profits of the clinic and thus put the clinic out of business.
Count 12
Fact: I declare Jacques S. Jaikaran and Eric Yollick using his occupational license, his personal influence and political influence with the presiding officer of the 9th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas acting in collusions with the other Respondents have use deceptive trade practices, commercial Fraud, made fraudulent commercial claims, stole funds, acting in collusion with the officers of the Mesquite Bank to steal more funds from the accounts belonging to Texas spine Medical Centers, racketeering using fraudulent Fictional Plaintiff and a fraudulent Fictional Defendant.
Count 13
Fact: I declare all the Respondents have used my copyright without my consent and have refused to pay per the contract agreement and judgment has been entered against Jacques S. Jaikaran and Eric Yollick. I petition the court for enforcement of the said judgment.
Count 14
Fact: I declare that just and fair restitution must issue to me, the owners and creditors the employees and patients of the clinics known as Texas Spine Medical Centers.
Count 15
Fact: I further declare if the county judge of the county of Dallas as well as the Commissioners had done their duty these crimes could never have been done.
If anyone has information that would controvert and overcome this declaration in the nature of an Affidavit Statement, please advise me IN DECLARATION/AFFIDAVIT FORM by writing WITHIN five (5) DAYS from receipt hereof a counter-affidavit, proving with particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and not merely the ultimate facts or conclusions of law, that this Declaration/Affidavit Statement is substantially and materially false sufficiently to change materially my status and factual declarations. Your silence stands as consent to and tacit approval of, the factual declarations herein being established as fact as a matter of law.
I do understand the liabilities for making false statements and do accept all liability for my acts. (Briscoe v. LaHue 460 U.S. 325) If there is anyone being damaged unjustly by any statement herein, if he/she will inform me by facts, I will sincerely make every effort to amend my ways. I reserve my unalienable right to amend this declaration/Affidavit as necessary at times and places of my own choosing, according as new facts and revelations are made available to me at various future times and places as yet unknown, and as yet to be determined, in order that the truth may be ascertained. May the will of the Heavenly Father be done on earth as it is in Heaven. (Matthew 6:10)
Executed pursuant to the laws of the united States of America this ____ day of the month of March in the year of our Lord and Savior, two-thousand-four.
With full reservation of all my natural God given substantive rights,
By mark:___________________________________________
addressee, Daniel: Boudreau
mailing location; P.O. Box 850187 Mesquite, Texas 75185
State of Texas
County of Dallas
This instrument Verified Non-negotiable Civil and Criminal Complaint by Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit of truth in commerce was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this ____day of the month of March in the year of our Lord and savior, Jesus Christ two-thousand-four.
Name: ______________________________________ Seal:
Notary Public
Signed and Sealed
NOTICE: Clerk for the county of Dallas, Texas
March 15, 2004
To: The person in office of the clerk for the people of county of Dallas
County of Dallas Records Building
Dallas, Texas
Dear Clerk,
The county judge and county commissioners have vacated their office and have failed to convene the court and set the time and term of the court. There being laws prescribed pursuant to the Texas Constitution requiring the county-judge to convene the court and the county commissioners to set the time and term of the court. The county judge and county commissioners failure to perform the duties of their office per their sworn oath have willfully vacated their office.
Whereas the Texas Constitution mandates, pursuant to Article I Section 13 that all courts shall be open and whereas Section 15 mandates that I have a right of trial by jury. Whereas Section 16 mandates that the state cannot pass any laws impairing the obligation of contract. And whereas Section 19 mandates that I have a right to trial by law. And whereas Article 5 Section 15 of the Texas Constitution mandates that there shall be a court of record. And whereas Section 17 mandates an action shall commence in a court of record by either an affidavit or information. And whereas Section 29 mandates by law that either the legislature or the commissioners court shall set the time and term for the county court of record and that the county court of record is to hold at least 4 terms for both civil and criminal business. Therefore you are to immediately notify the jurors and the legislature that this suit is pending. In the event that the legislature fails to set the time and term of the court you are to notify the article III of the federal constitution Circuit Court judge for the United States for enforcement of Texas and Federal Constitution pursuant to the 7th amendment. You are to keep an official log of all notices and responses and to transmit the log to me on a weekly basis
Daniel: Boudreau, P.O. Box 850187, Mesquite, Texas 75185 until such time the court is open and functioning and a trial date has been set in this matter.
Signed and Recorded
2004 050 00018; 2004 050 00019; 2004 050 00020; 2004 050 00021;
2004 050 00022; 2004 050 00023; 2004 050 00024
Dallas County Clerks Office
March 15, 2004 9:52 AM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Daniel Boudreau, personally delivered this complaint to the officers of the First State Bank, 419 Military Parkway, Mesquite, Texas 75149, acting as agents for the Respondents.
Time:___________P.M. Day__________of March 2004.
NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO THE AGENT
Note: Original copy is available on our CD
[Notice by Declaration Posted March 19, 2004]
Below is a Notice by Declaration!
Today another Crime has been committed against one of the People of Texas. The commercial record has been falsified with willful intent and a man has again been converted into a fiction "Defendant" to procure judgment for over 800,000.00 dollars using a fictional "plaintiff" for the enrichment of the Crown's agents the "Esquires" aka attorneys.
Trial by jury has been suspended in Texas! There are no courts and all matters are handled in chambers in secret by the Crowns agents the Crown's "Esquires" and the only parties allowed in chambers are the Crown's agents bar card attorneys. All private property rights have been suspended and all due process rights have been suspended! All law has been suspended! The law is made in chambers by the Crown's Esquires for the enrichment of the Esquires. No defence or affidavits allowed and the Esquires have assumed the authority to over rule the common-law of Texas and the county records.
They can make a claim against what-ever they want and procure judgment to take it. It will not be very long till the Crown and the Crown's agent will own all of Texas and every thing in it.
No notice of hearing was given and all proceedings were held in secret! The presiding judge was secret without a name but a final judgment was issued to take over 800,000 dollars out of a bank account of one of the people. No name or identity of judge was on the Judgment.
Below is the Notice by Declaration sent before judgment was recorded!
Notice to all parties pursuant to claim number 04-02-01234-CV by declaration of Daniel: Boudreau this17th day of March 2004.
REF: 'FIRST STATE BANK THIRD-PARTY PETITION FOR INTERPLEADER AND PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT' HAS BEEN RECORDED IN A COMMERCIAL REGISTRY USING FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS.
I, Daniel: Boudreau, a living man, declare that I am not the defendant 'DANIEL BOUDREAU.' I declare that DANIEL BOUDREAU and all derivatives thereof is a fiction and my private intellectual property. I hold exclusive title to DANIEL BOUDREAU and all derivatives thereof and have not given my consent and have not consented for any of the parties as named in claim number 04-02-01234-CV to use my private intellectual property.
Gary M Vodicka in his pleading, as styled above, has falsified the commercial record with willful intent has converted me, Daniel: Boudreau, into a fictional entity named defendant DANIEL BOUDREAU, in paragraph 3, again in paragraph 7, again in paragraph 7, again in paragraph 8, again in paragraph 12 (b),and again in paragraph 12 (b), 12(c), 12(e), 12(f), 12(g), with the intent of divesting me of all my rights, in violation of state and federal Constitutions and is guilty of applying commercial corporate rules, statutes, and codes upon me a living man, one of the sovereign people of Texas, by criminal conversion of me Daniel: Boudreau in to a fictional entity 'Defendant DANIEL BOUDREAU.'
Therefore, I am forced to do discovery on Gary M Vodicka and his principals. I, Daniel Boudreau, the owner and not the debtor Defendant DANIEL BOUDREAU, demand that he or his principals produce the said contract between me and JACQUES S. JAIKARAN, M.D. v. DANIEL A. BOUDREAU, D.O. where as I, Daniel: Boudreau, the living man, owner, signed and agreed to be the surety and bound my copyright DANIEL A. BOUDREAU, D.O. to Jacques S. Jaikaran or to the fictitious plaintiff 'JACQUES S. JAIKARAN, M.D.'
Failure to produce said contract will cause a bill to be issued to Gary M. Vodicka and his principals per the contract agreement as recorded in the county records of the county of Dallas for the use of my private intellectual property DANIEL BOUDREAU
Ten (10) days should be sufficient for Gary M. Vodicka to produce said contract.
I, Daniel: Boudreau, declare this matter was conceived in fraud and remains in fraud and I, Daniel: Boudreau, and others, have been damaged by fraud.
Executed pursuant to title 28 USC 1746 (1) by me, _________ this 17th day of March 2004.
Service by Fax to Gary M. Vodicka a commercial agent 214-373-0347
[Declaration to Bank Posted March 19, 2004]
First State Bank
Officers and agents
James D (V-misspelled) Lindsey, Brenda Sanders and Gary M. Vadicka
Mesquite, Texas
Notice by Declaration by me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man
Demand is made of you by me to furnish me the following in claim number 04-02-01234-Cv Judgment order you are using to hold my funds deposited by me in an account in your bank in checks and currency belonging to the owners and creditors of Texas Spine Medical Centers in the county of Dallas, Texas
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man , a living soul, declare, having the right of due process, trial by jury by law, before any property is taken pursuant to Texas PRACTICE & REMEDIES CODE SUBTITLE C. JUDGMENTS, supply me the following immediately within 72 hours and before any funds are released to anyone by you pursuant to: CHAPTER 31. JUDGMENTS 31.010. TURNOVER BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTION. (a) A financial institution that receives a request to turn over assets or financial information of a judgment debtor to a judgment creditor or a receiver under a turnover order or receivership under Section 31.002 shall be provided and may rely on:
(1) a certified copy of the order or injunction of the court; or
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately supply me a certified copy of the court order signed by all 12 of the juries.
(2) a certified copy of the order of appointment of a receiver under Section 64.001, including a certified copy of:
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately supply me a certified copy of the appointment of a receiver signed by all 12 of the juries.
(A) any document establishing the qualification
of the receiver under Section 64.021;
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately supply me with any and all documents establishing the qualification of said receiver as certified by said juries.
(B) the sworn affidavit under Section 64.022;
and
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately supply me a certified copy of the sworn affidavit before releasing any funds.
(C) the bond under Section 64.023.
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately supply me with a certified copy of the bond before releasing any funds to any party.
(b) A financial institution that complies with this section is not liable for compliance with a court order, injunction, or receivership authorized by Section 31.002 to:
(1) the judgment debtor;
(2) a party claiming through the judgment debtor;
(3) a co-depositor with the judgment debtor; or
(4) a co-borrower with the judgment debtor.
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately state to me under penalty of perjury with reasonable and certain terms, what would lead you to believe that I one of the people of one of the several counties of one of the several States united the creditors am a judgment debtor to a fictional plaintiff JACQUES S. JAIKARAN M.D. and show proof by certified facts and judgment of the jury.
(c) A financial institution that complies with this section is entitled to recover reasonable costs, including copying costs, research costs, and, if there is a contest, reasonable attorney's fees.
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately state under the penalty of perjury that you have complied with all the above and you are entitled to tax for the $30,000.00 from the accounts that I Daniel am the signor on.
I, me, Daniel: Boudreau, a man, a living soul declare you are to immediately supply me with a legible and readable name of the JUDGE PRESIDING on all orders, decrees, adjudge, judgments and writs in any and all matters that would give you the authority to hold funds in all the accounts in your bank that I am the signor on.
(d) In this section, 'financial institution' means a state or national bank, state or federal savings and loan association, state or federal savings bank, state or federal credit union, foreign bank, foreign bank agency, or trust company.
Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 892, Section 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.
You are to supply me the above requested items within 72 hours or sooner.
Executed pursuant to Title 28 USC 1746 (1) by me _______________________ this 18th day of March 2004.
I, me, (upper and lower case name), a man, another, created by God, will come into the Court, lie and claim I am the fictional actor a corporate vessel created by the STATE known as (CAPITAL LETTER FICTIONAL ACTORS NAME) if you and the Court will promise me in writing that you and the Court will discharge me and not charge me with perjury.
An immediate response is required of you and the Court so I may know what you and the Court would have me to do.
Executed pursuant to the laws of Texas (any State) this ____ day of month in the year (write out) by me, addressee, ____________________________ a man, another, created by God and not the actor a fictional corporate vessel created by the STATE known as CAPITOL LETTER FICTIONAL ACTORS NAMED.
Demand for CONGRESSIONAL injunctive relief and notice of criminal racketeering and sedition by members of the commercial association known as the TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION operating in collusion with STATE, COUNTIES, and CITIES, all commercial trust entities, in violation of the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution.
Senator Deuell: I am giving you demand for congressional injunctive relief and notice of criminal racketeering and sedition by commercial entities created by misnomer, willful idem sonans, deceptive trade practices, lack of full disclosure, in want of jurisdiction, for and in the name of which the Texas Legislators create legislation, and for which is approved by the Governor in violation of the rules and laws of Texas and the Constitution for Texas, and approved by action of law by the acquiescence of the un-informed people who have faithfully placed in your hands their trust that their elected officials would not betray them and fall into a condition of sedition.
I as well as others in Texas have suffered regularly and on going thief of land, funds (Federal Reserve Notes, mortgage Notes and gold Coins) and liberty, inflicted upon us by the statutorily created commercial trust entities using copyrighted law and commercial chambers impersonating lawful courts in which we the people can not appear for want of license.
I have been denied due process, a republican form of government, redress and remedy by due course of law, all because the chief judge of the highest commercial Court in this THE STATE OF TEXAS has without delegation of authority issued an unlawful opinion that the lawful Article 5, Section 15 county court of record should close and not accept any cases concerning the people and matters of law.
Most recently, BAR CARD commercial trust agents have used a parole violator and a tax violator for falsely fabricating commercial cases and used it for taking $500,000.00 and my land located within the limits of Mesquite, Texas by using the improperly enacted STATE and COUNTY statutorily created commercial Courts. All of the actors participating in concert for the scheme and artifice for defrauding me out of my assets are all BAR CARD commercial welfare trust agents and members of this STATE OF TEXAS created perpetual monopoly known as the TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION, and the Medical association and said BAR ASSOCIATION is uncontrolled and unregulated by any oversight agency answerable to the people.
This said BAR CARD association and the commercial Courts operated by their members excludes me and the people from remedy by requiring the licensing of anyone practicing inside the commercial chamber, and are using private copyrighted law.
Senator Deuell you and your fellow Legislators have all taken the Article 16, Section 1 Official Oath to uphold the Constitutions for both, the State of Texas and the United States of America. If you have not then you all are without office. The county commissioners, county judge, sheriff, and county clerk have also taken the same oath.
Now I bring to your attention a few of the laws you and your fellow legislators are required for upholding as a responsibility for taking the oath contracting with the people for specific performance and ascending to office.
Preservation of a republican form of government as mandated by the Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 2. I want to remind you that a republican form of government is not a subsidiary commercial welfare trust enterprise known alternatively as this STATE, or this State or THE STATE OF TEXAS, which are all names of a subsidiary welfare trust enterprise of a national socialist democracy cestui que welfare trust enterprise headquartered in Washington, known as the UNITED STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA which said trusts exist by action simply because the people have not been given full disclosure of how the government and judiciary were taken over, and the people do not know how to restore their lawful government.
Preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired. (That means county government by Law, and not a STATE administrative welfare trust by statute.]
Equality under law is mandatory. That means that the BAR ASSOCIATION is answerable to the people, and the people must have a court for remedy that is not operated by BAR CARD commercial agents. The practice here in Dallas of the civil District Attorney, a commercial agent of the commercial side of our State of Texas, and a BAR member, telling the County Clerk what she can and cannot file must be ended immediately. By what delegation of authority do commercial agents have the authority to interfere with the government of the people and dictate to a man in full capacity what he can and cannot place in the record for the public, or dictate to the recorder of the county what she can and cannot record for the record of the public? You must address this issue at once. This issue goes hand into glove with the county Clerk being the docket clerk for the county Court of record. By what authority do BAR CARD commercial agents dictate to the county clerk the scope and requirements and authority of her office?
The jury of peers shall have the right to determine the law and the facts in all cases. That means that the county Court of record must be reopen and the clerk must advertise for a jury pool of competent people who have read and understand the Constitution and who are competent for law remedy, and who are not members of the democratic welfare trust and which said members of the democratic welfare trust are not competent to reach a law remedy or sit in judgment of a case concerning law and a non-member of the welfare trust. See Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288 (1936), and Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney General, 124 U. S. 581.
No action can begin in any court without probable cause, meaning a declaration from a victim supported by oath or affirmation. A BAR CARD commercial agent or one of the commercial agent minions in uniform writing up a complaint is not a declaration from a victim. We the people are not commercial person actors and violators. We are people and we are entitled to all of the protections expressed in Article 1 of the Texas Constitution, especially Article 1, Section 10.
I want you and your fellow Legislators to read Article 1 Section 10 of the Texas Constitution, which said Constitution you have taken an oath to uphold. Section 10 is being violated by every BAR CARD commercial agent prosecutor and every BAR CARD commercial chamber judge for every case against one of the people who is a non-member of the democratic welfare trust that is brought into these commercial Courts, which said commercial Courts have been unlawfully enacted in the name of this THE STATE OF TEXAS allegedly with the authority of the State of Texas. By what authority does the legislature of the lawful State of Texas enact legislation in the name of this State, THE STATE OF TEXAS?
The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right, and shall never be suspended. Article 3, Section 62 is very emphatic in the _expression of the fact that no matter if the elected officers of the State of Texas decided to suspend the constitution and the lawful government and run under an emergency corporation government, the rights of the people remaining non-members of the democratic trust would be protected. This protection of the rights of the people tracks the protection contained in the footnote of the United States Code Title 5, Section 559 footnotes indicating that the writers of our Texas Constitution were far advanced in their determination for protecting the rights of the people in times of greed, deception, and emergency rule advocated by BAR CARD commercial agents. A statutory commercial writ of Habeas Corpus submitted to the Court of Criminal Appeals, which is one of the commercial chambers is not a Writ of Right as required by the Texas Constitution. A Writ of Habeas Corpus that invokes the Law that is denied by the Court of Criminal Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court with a terse statement about lack of jurisdiction is not guaranteeing remedy for those of us who are non-members of and foreign (strangers) to the democratic welfare trust operated in this STATE.
As mandated by the Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 13, all courts shall be open. (One of those said courts is the Law side of the article 5 Section 15 constitutional county Court of record. The Lawful constitutional county Court of record of the people cannot be closed by an opinion of the chief judge of the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, which SUPREME COURT is a commercial chamber of the democratic welfare trust scheme.) For every injury done him, in his lands, goods, person or reputation, it is mandated by the Texas Constitution that every man shall have remedy by due course of law. No where in law or statute of the state of Texas is it published that the people who are non-members of the democratic welfare trust must contract with commercial agents of this THE STATE OF TEXAS and use copyrighted statute and rules belonging to West publishing company, which is a subsidiary corporation of the Thompson group, which is incorporated in the City of London, England. I and many others are without remedy by law. We are respecters of copyright law and we know who we are and our law venue. By what delegation of authority did the chief judge of the BAR CARD operated commercial chamber known as THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS issue an opinion closing the county Court of record of the Article 5, Section 15 county Courts? You must address this question. You must provide for me the answer about where and how the said BAR CARD commercial agent chief judge got the delegation of authority for closing the constitutional county Court of record of the people.
The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. The Texas Constitution at Article 1, Section 19 is explicit and requires that a trial by jury of peers by law of the land be offered to those of us who know what is that venue. Specifically, a jury trial wherein an advisory jury panel of legally disabled democratic welfare trust members, (see above Ashwander and Great Falls), who are impersonating a lawful jury, who have not studied the law, and who have about as much brainpower as a herd of cows, and who are specifically culled during the jury selection process for their stupidity and eagerness for accepting fiction in place of fact, by the BAR CARD district attorneys, again, they are commercial agents of the democratic welfare trust known as this STATE, is not a trial by jury as mandated by Article 1, Section 19. You must restore the remedy for the people who are not subject to benefits.
No citizen of Texas shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disfranchised, except by the due of the law of the land. Specifically, for those of us who are not members of the democratic welfare trust, we cannot be forced to use copyrighted statute in commercial chambers of this STATE operated exclusively by BAR CARD commercial agents. By what authority must I be forced to contract with a BAR CARD attorney operating commercial chamber which is inferior to my constitutionally protected court and remedy?
Article 1, Section 29, was specifically placed into the constitution for protecting the rights of the people who are not members of the democratic welfare trust of this STATE. The Section 29 expresses in part: "To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein (notice it does not say higher powers) delegated, (notice it says delegated) we declare everything in this 'Bill of Rights' is excepted out of the general powers of government, (that means acts of the legislature, meaning statute and commercial chamber judges are not superior to the people), and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary thereto, or to the following provisions, shall be void." Specifically there is no authority by law for the closing of the constitutional county Court of record. The Article 5, Section 15 county Court of record must be immediately reopened for business. The commissioners are to set the time and term for the court and the clerk is to docket the causes and the judge is to seat the Court from a pool of men carefully chosen unlike the choosing of advisory jury panels for their stupidity and ability to accept fiction in place of fact. You must address this issue at once. In actuality, the State of Texas does not exist without there being a court for remedy for the people who are not members of the commercial welfare trust. There being no lawful government here in Texas, then remedy may lay in another law venue external to Texas for enforcement of the formation documents of Texas.
Article 3, Section 62 specifically expresses that all of Article I of the Constitution of Texas known as the "Bill of Rights" "shall not be in any manner affected, amended, impaired, suspended, repealed or suspended hereby" by the legislators should the legislators ever decide to suspend the constitution or operate the State of Texas as a commercial welfare trust enterprise known as this STATE and/or THE STATE OF TEXAS, or to unlawfully enact legislation for this THE STATE OF TEXAS and make claims on the title pages of the legislation that such legislation of this STATE is enacted by the authority of the State of Texas, which is absolute nonsense, unlawful, without delegation of authority, and is sedition. How many of these acts have you given your approval? Check the law. An unrecorded voice vote does not suspend the rules. A 4/5ths record vote is required for suspending the rules and the constitution.
Senator Deuell, you have taken an oath to uphold the laws of the state of Texas and the Texas Constitution. I accept your Official Oath as your contract with me and the people and I expect you and your fellow legislators to uphold the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution. The Article 5, Section 15, county Court of record has been closed without delegation of authority by an unlawful opinion of a BAR CARD commercial chamber agents operating for the unjust self enrichment of the commercial agents of this STATE. There being no authority for the issuing of the said opinion, the causing of the ignorant county Court judges to close the law side of our courts is a crime of sedition.
The county commissioners here in the county of Dallas refuse to fix the time and term of the county Court of record. The clerk has refused to docket the petitions for redress. And the county Judge, Ms. Margaret Kelleher, who is legally disabled from holding the position of county Judge because she is a BAR CARD commercial agent from the commercial venue, has refused to seat the Court and open the Court for business probably with the understanding that she not competent for holding a session of a law venue Court.
The unlawfully enacted statutory courts operating under the banner of this THE STATE OF TEXAS, which said banner is prohibited by the Texas Constitution Article 5, Section 12, and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 15, 99, 114, 176, the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 1.23 and over 40 other cites of rules of prohibition for running writs and process in the name of this THE STATE OF TEXAS are in want of jurisdiction of me and my private property and matters affecting me, and the same lack of jurisdiction applies to other sovereigns in full capacity similarly situated as myself.
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS has concurred to this fact by dismissing all of my petitions for redress for want of jurisdiction except a writ of habeas corpus. I am without a Court for redress by law and due process by law. You and your fellow legislators are required to ensure that the remedy protected to me by the Texas Constitution is available to me. As a member nation in the united States of America, the legislature and the governor of Texas is contracted to provide for me, and I am guaranteed, a republican form of government and a law remedy for my injuries and grievances.
The county Court of record must be reopened immediately as mandated by the laws of Texas and it's Constitution which you and your fellow Legislators have sworn to uphold under the pains and penalty of perjury. There is already a lawfully elected judge who has been denied his courtroom. Because the judge who was elected by the registered voters in the corporate democratic welfare trust elections, Ms. Kelleher, is a BAR CARD commercial agent, she is not competent for sitting as a judge in a law venue. However, concerning the lawful Article 5, Section 15 County Court of record and county Judge, we have such a judge already lawfully elected and all we need is the enforcement from you and your fellow legislators for obtaining a courtroom and having the county Clerk docket the cases.
I expect to hear from you within ten (10) days about what are your plans for bringing to the attention of the legislature that there must be a remedy of this injustice and violation of the law and Constitution by the BAR CARD commercial agents of this STATE who have completed a takeover of our lawful government and judiciary under the color of law.
The lawful Article 5, Section 15 county Court of record must be re-opened. Tell me within ten (10) DAYS when you plan to begin abiding by your Official Oath and ensure that the court is re-opened without delay AS MANDATED BY LAW.
