|
|
|
|
|
Effective immediately all Additions to the WebSite: micromann.freeservers.com will be added to this site in order by date.
DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF EXPATRIATION
January 17, 2002
state of Texas Section
republic of Texas Section Subscribed, and Sealed
county of Dallas Section
Know all men by these presents:
DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF EXPATRIATION, SEVERANCE, WAIVER, FORFEITURE, AND REJECTION OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME BENEFITS in the nature of an AFFIDAVIT
I, Ralph-kenneth, Evans and all derivatives thereof, a man, living soul, Citizen/sovereign, Kemper v. State, 138 S. W. 1025, page 1043, Declarant, declare that I am competent to testify, that I am over the age of majority, that the following facts stated are true and correct, and if I am called to testify in a court of proper venue and jurisdiction, I will so declare.
I, Ralph-kenneth, Evans and all derivatives thereof, a man, living soul, (hereinafter Declarant, I, Me, or Myself), by this Declaration in the nature of an Affidavit, hereby timely and publicly give Notice to the world of My "DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF EXPATRIATION, SEVERANCE, WAIVER, FORFEITURE, AND REJECTION OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME BENEFITS in the nature of an AFFIDAVIT" publishing My total rejection and non-acceptance of all enfranchisement benefits, imposed by this STATE, the STATE OF TEXAS, and the UNITED STATES, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Cartel"), or any other party, juristic or otherwise, because of the intentional neglect of the Cartel of ensuring knowledge by notice and full disclosure, the neglect of the Cartel of ensuring willingness by notice and full disclosure, and the neglect of the Cartel of ensuring that there has been an exchange of a certain and fair and valuable consideration, (hereinafter knowing, willing, and exchange of certain and fair and valuable consideration are the "tenets of simple contracting"), on the part of commercial agents of the Cartel.
I, Declarant, declare that this notice of Expatriation, severance, waiver, forfeiture and rejection of benefits is not limited to severance, waiver, forfeiture and rejection of recourse and contract enforcement benefits under the Texas Business and Commerce Code (Uniform Commercial Code) and police protection benefits. I hereby explicitly sever, waive, forfeit and reject all implied trusts, powers of attorney, judicial contract enforcement, and police protection benefits for negligent failure of fair notice and full disclosure and for negligent failure of exchange of certain, fair and valuable consideration and the concealment of status-changing adhesion contracts imposed upon Declarant, by the commercial agents of the Cartel.
I, Declarant, hereby declare, that for all the foregoing reasons stated, Declarant hereby revokes, severs, waives, forfeits, and rejects all implied trusts, all powers of attorney, and all contracts imposed or attempted being imposed by the commercial agents of the judicial system of the Cartel, especially those implied trusts, powers of attorney, and contracts in which the STATE OF TEXAS is a party to any action. It is res judicata and stare decisis that fraud vitiates all contracts ab initio. Said trusts, powers of attorney, and contracts are, nunc pro tunc, ab initio December 13, 1937, deemed in a condition of annulment.
I, Declarant, by publishing this affidavit of Expatriation into the public record, hereby declares, claims, implements, and enforces the Right, privilege, and immunity for being free from slavery, Bailey v Alabama, 219 U. S. 219, that is provided for in 15 United States Statutes at Large, Chap. 249, page 223, 40th Congress for expatriating My res in trust from the foreign jurisdiction known as the municipal corporation of the District of Colombia, a.k.a. variously, the United States of America and the United States, as defined at Title 26 IRC Section 7701 (a)(9) and (10), and Title 26 IRC Section 3121(e)(1)and (2), and Title 28 USC Section 3002(15) and all of its municipal corporations, political subdivisions, states, States, and their political subdivisions and municipal corporations and by this public notice do hereby repatriate My res into the Land within the outer borders of the de jure state of and republic of Texas in which I am guaranteed the preservation of immemorial GOD given Rights under a Republican Form of Government as proscribed in Article 1, Section 2 and Section 29 of the Constitution of the republic of and state of Texas.
I, Declarant, further declare that, ab initio, for failure of being created based upon the tenets of simple contracting and for the concealment of status-changing adhesion contracts, all past and present contracts for registration, of the appellation of Declarant, or RALPH KENNETH EVANS copyright, a copyrighted legal fiction and Title, or any derivations of the copyrighted legal fiction, or the juristic person, the juristic person without notice and without full disclosure created by the assignment of a number by commercial agents of the de facto corporation government of the Cartel for the use by the public trust, and again presumption specifically rebutted and Declarant gives Notice of Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 52 that Declarant is not a private corporation, nor a natural or juristic person, and Declarant is a man living soul, said appellation and legal fiction being private property belonging to Declarant, said contracts implied by operation of law or otherwise in trust with the above cited municipal corporations nunc pro tunc, ab initio, are hereby revoked, dissolved and terminated, and are in a condition of annulment.
I, Declarant, gives this notice to the public at large and to the commercial agents of the Cartel, that, with respect to the public trust, the status of the Declarant is that of civiliter mortuus to the public trust and Declarant voluntarily severs, waives, rejects, forfeits, and refuses accepting all franchised and co-franchised benefits, and it is deemed that Declarant has never accepted a benefit from the public trust.
I, Declarant, further declares that by the laws of Nature and the laws of simple contracting, and with this public notice of Expatriation, severance, waiver, forfeiture and rejection of admiralty and maritime benefits, there is total termination of all rights, privileges, immunities, responsibilities, duties, and obligations arising under statute between Declarant, or the fiction belonging to Declarant, and the Cartel, and all said duties and obligations cease altogether, and further, there are no residual reciprocal obligations imposed upon either party. Declarant will avoid the Cartel, and the Cartel must avoid the Declarant.
I, Declarant, and the legal fiction, RALPH KENNETH EVANS copyright, and all created-without-notice juristic persons allegedly being Declarant, ab initio, explicitly reserve the Right of not being compelled for performing under any contracts, or commercial agreements, which have not been created based upon the tenets of simple contracting and 'meeting of the minds', and by such 'Reservation of Right,' I, Declarant, or RALPH KENNETH EVANS copyright, or derivations, and all alleged juristic persons, do not, and will not, accept, and specifically reject the direct or adhesion liability associated with the compelled benefits of such unrevealed contracts or commercial agreements, or both, be they Admiralty, Maritime, or otherwise.
"Further Declarant Sayeth Naught."
Executed under the laws of the united States of America on January ___, 2002, and all the foregoing applies ab initio from December 13, 1937.
L. S.
Ralph-kenneth,Evans, a man, Declarant, Citizen/sovereign, county of Dallas, republic and state of Texas.
VERIFICATION
On this January xxx, 2002, Ralph-kenneth, Evans, a living man, appeared before Me, a Notary Public from within the outer borders of the state of Texas, and after declaring before me, He does say and declare that He does execute the forgoing "Declaration And Notice Of Expatriation Severance, Waiver, Forfeiture, And Rejection Of Admiralty And Maritime Benefits in the nature of an Affidavit" and that under the penalty of perjury pursuant to the Law of the republic of and the state of Texas, and the Texas Government Code Section 602.004, 'declaration made outside United States,' in recognition of the Laws of the united states of America cited in statute at Title 28 USC Section 1746(1), without the UNITED STATES [as defined at Title 26 IRC Section 7701 and Section 3121(e)(1) and (2), and Title 28 USC Section 3002(15)], He declares that the contents of the foregoing Declaration are true and correct and if called to testify in a court of proper venue and jurisdiction, will so declare.
Signed and subscribed before me, a Notary Public from the state of Texas, this January ___, 2002.
Notary Public SEAL:
DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF EXPATRIATION, SEVERANCE, WAIVER, FORFEITURE, AND REJECTION OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME BENEFITS in the nature of an AFFIDAVIT
Declaration for Tom Mohr
January 17, 2002
To: Clerk of the county of Tarrant, Texas state
And county Judge for the people's one supreme Court of record
Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit in Truth of the living man, Ralph-kenneth, evans one of We the People as required by law Article 5 Section 17 of the 1876 Constitution for Texas.
This 17th day of January 2002.
I, Ralph-kenneth, evans and all derivatives thereof, a man, living soul, Citizen/sovereign, Kemper v. State, 138 S. W. 1025, page 1043, Declarant, declare that I am competent to testify, that I am over the age of twenty-one, that the following facts stated are true and correct, and if I am called to testify in a court of proper venue and jurisdiction, I will so declare.
I declare I was present in the court room behind Lewis Thompson Mohr on one of the benches where the people sit when the docket was called for January 15, 2002, about 9 A.M. in the matter of the alleged admiralty maritime Claim Number 0815603 concerning Lewis Thompson Mohr whom is being held in the COMMERCIAL PRISON OF TARRANT COUNTY FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS for leaving the Court when he was never called from the docket by the Bailiff or was never told by anyone He was not free to leave.
I declare that Lewis Thompson Mohr was not called for trial by the Bailiff or told by anyone he was not free to leave the Courtroom on January 15, 2002.
I declare Travis Ray Mohr was called and the Bailiff did ask Lewis Thompson was he Travis Ray to which Lewis Thompson relied no.
When the Bailiff announced that was all of the Court Docket for that day business. Lewis Thompson Mohr left the Courtroom and not until the complete docket was called as announce by the Bailiff.
I declare that Lewis Thompson Mohr was present He was not called. He was present till the bailiff called the complete docket and I declare that Lewis Thompson Mohr was not called for any business for that morning docket or told by anyone he was not free to leave the Court or he should return anytime in the future.
I declare that I am a party interested in good government and I want someone to tell me what is going on here.
"Further Declarant Sayeth Naught."
Executed under the laws of the united States of America on January 17th, 2002; by me
Ralph-kenneth, family of Evans, a man, Declarant, Citizen/sovereign, county of Dallas, republic and state of Texas.
Non negotiable Bill of Exchange
January 21, 2002
Non-negotiable Bill of Exchange
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date XXXXXXXXX, 2001.
Non-negotiable Notice and Demand for payment for the unauthorized use of my recorded copyright on the terms of previous accepted contract and agreement. Recorded in the public records for county of Dallas, Texas in the matter of the use of my copyright fiction Attached.
Please pay immediately. Please send payment within ten (10) days.
From: me addressee, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx
mail location Exact: post office for the States united
Xxxxxx, Texas
To: issuer KENNETH L. MAUN
TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR and
User COLLIN COUNTY
1800 N. GRAVES ST., SUITE 170
P.O. BOX 8006
MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75070-8006
Demand for payment per Art 1. Sect. 10 Constitution for the United States as follows;
The person named by you as KENNETH L. MAUN, 1,000,000.00 dollars silver specie coin of the United States due from you to me for use of my copyright XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX(c) (and all derivatives thereof).
The user named by you as COLLIN COUNTY, 1,000,000.00 dollars silver specie coin of the United States due from you to me for use of my copyright XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX(c) (and all derivatives thereof).
For a total sum certain 2,000,000.00 dollars silver specie coin of the United States.
* This being a matter of commerce, three days (72 hours) is allowed under Regulation Z for settlement of the private commercial accounts. Notice and demand for payment. Please pay immediately. Failure to pay will cause a suit to be filed against the Commissioners for the county of Collin Texas under federal Copy Right law infringement United States Code
o TITLE 18- CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
o PART ONE
o CHAPTER 113 - STOLEN PROPERTY
U.S. Code as of: 01/05/99 Section 2319. Criminal infringement of a copyright
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
By me, addressee Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party,
Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 this xxx day of December
two-thousand two A.D. to issuer KENNETH L. MAUN, and User COLLIN COUNTY
by me Addressee :
Non negotiable Notice and Demand Discovery
January 21, 2002
Non-negotiable Notice and Demand Discovery
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date XXXXXXXXX, 2001.
Non-Negotiable Notice that all Tax Bills and PROPERTY TAX STATEMENTS are to be addressed to me, addressee Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party and must be signed under penalty of perjury AND SHALL NOT BE vague OR ambiguous.
Non-negotiable notice and demand for full disclosure the following items must be answered:
* Please be exact what form of payment is required for the tax and what type of Currency is required for the tax?
* Will you accept credit of the United States in discharge of the debit as mandated by House Joint Resolution 192?
* Will you accept stamp for payment?
* What property are you taxing?
* Are you taxing my land?
* What type of tax is it?
* Do you have a delegation of authority for issuing the tax assessment to me? If so who from?
* Are you a commercial agent?
* Are you operating under commerce?
* Are you representing a corporation? If so what is the name of the corporation you represent?
* Enclose the tax assessment and return signed under penalty of perjury as mandated by law, showing whom the assessment and return is for and what is exactly being tax.
* Is the Copyrighted Fictional character XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX my private property being taxed?
Please reply within ten (10) days if you require more time please ask me for more time in writing.
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
By me, addressee Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party,
Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 this xxx day of Month
two-thousand two A.D. to issuer KENNETH L. MAUN, and User COLLIN COUNTY
by me Addressee :
Notice of Acceptance of Offer and Contract in Commerce in law
January 21, 2002
Notice of Acceptance of Offer and Contract in Commerce in law
Notice and Demand for payment for the unauthorized use of my recorded copyright. Recorder number 00000000 per the terms of the accepted contract/ agreement for use of copyrights as recorded in the public records for county of Dallas, Texas.
Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange in accord with contract/agreement with/for the persons known as KENNETH L. MAUN and COLLIN COUNTY on 2001 PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER R-0000-000-0000-0 unsigned and undated.
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date XXXXXXXXX, 2001.
Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange by Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit of the living man, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party, secured party one of We the People as required by law Article 5 Section 17 of the 1876 Constitution for the State of Texas.
Republic of and one of the
several united States of America, Texas
county of Collin
Declaration IN SUPPORT OF Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange
Verified Statements in Support of Non-Negotiable of Bill of Exchange in accord with contract/agreement with/for the persons known as KENNETH L. MAUN and COLLIN COUNTY on 2001 PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT, ACCOUNT NUMBER R-0000-000-0000-0 unsigned and undated. (herein after Respondents).
In the Matter of the criminal trespass and infringement upon title to private copyright for your debt without authority or my consent.
I, me the undersigned one of We, the People, Sovereigns, living souls, the posterity, preferred stock holders, born upon the land in the one of several counties within the one of the several States united in America, I, me the undersigned Posterity, Creditor, Claimant, holder in due course and Secured Party, hereinafter Secured Party, or I, or myself, or me, or addressee Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx does hereby solemnly declare, say, and state:
a. I, me, the Secured Party competent to state the matters set forth herewith.
b. Secured Party has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
c. All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, to the best of my knowledge and remembrance, admissible as evidence, and if testifying I, me, the Secured Party shall so state.
Plain Statement of Facts by declaration.
This Verified Statements in Support of Non-Negotiable of Bill of Exchange by Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit by me is made against Respondents.
1. On are about Month, KENNETH L. MAUN and COLLIN COUNTY on 2001 PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT, ACCOUNT NUMBER R-0000-000-0000-0 unsigned and undated used my copyright to take funds of xxx.xx from my estate for the benefit of the respondents without my consent.
2. On are about Month, KENNETH L. MAUN and COLLIN COUNTY on 2001 PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT, ACCOUNT NUMBER R-0000-000-0000-0 unsigned and undated used my copyright to take funds of xx.xx from my estate for the benefit of the respondents without my consent.
3. I, addressee Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx did place a copyright into the public records in the county of Dallas, Texas and in the public records with the Secretary of State for the State of Texas and removed the fictitious character of XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX and all derivatives of that fictitious character and remove from commerce and it is now my private property. The terms and condition for the use of said character was plainly spelled out in the recorded copyright contract/agreement recorded in the records of the county of Dallas, Texas, so that all would know the cost to them by me for the use of said name for taking anything of value from my estate.
4. The above listed parties have used my copyright for their own self-enrichment without authority or my consent.
5. The bill for said taking is now due and payable by each party as follows, KENNETH L. MAUN, two million United States dollars of silver specie (2,000,000.00) for using the copyright twice and COLLIN COUNTY, two million United States dollars of silver specie (2,000,000.00) for using the copyright twice on 2001 PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT, ACCOUNT NUMBER R-0000-000-0000-0 unsigned and undated for rights violations.
6. KENNETH L. MAUN and COLLIN COUNTY being responsible for the commercial entities under its jurisdiction and being a responsible party are responsible for the total amount certain four million United States dollars of silver specie (4,000,000.00).
7. Total amount of this Bill of Exchange due and payable within ten (10) days by KENNETH L. MAUN and COLLIN COUNTY after receipt of said Bill of Exchange being responsible for the total amount certain four million United States dollars of silver specie (4,000,000.00).
This Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange must be paid within ten (10) days from the date of receipt of said bill failure to pay within thirty days will cause a ten (10) percent penalty to be added to the total amount and ten (10) percent penalty will be added each thirty days there after until paid in full.
Having knowledge of the oppression, corruption and evil of the departments of governments in the United States I realize that this Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange may be impossible to collect in the United States I therefore reserve the right to sale said Bill in to the foreign exchange market for what ever amount it will bring in what ever currency I may choose.
If any living soul has information that would controvert and overcome this Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange by declaration in the nature of an Affidavit Statement, please advise me IN DECLARATION/AFFIDAVIT FORM by writing WITHIN thirty (30) DAYS from receipt hereof a counter-affidavit, proving with particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and not merely the ultimate facts or conclusions of law, that this Declaration/Affidavit Statement is substantially and materially false sufficiently to change materially my status and factual declarations stated herein and signed under penalty of perjury using their Christian name to post office for the States united, Xxxxxx, Texas. Your silence stands as consent to and tacit approval of, the factual declarations herein being established as fact as a matter of law.
I do understand the liabilities for making false statements and do accept all liability for my acts. (Briscoe v. LaHue 460 U.S. 325) If there is anyone being damaged unjustly by any statement herein, Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange if he/she will inform me by facts, I will sincerely make every effort to amend my ways. I reserve my unalienable right to amend this declaration/Affidavit Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange as necessary at times and places of my own choosing, according as new facts and revelations are made available to me at various future times and places as yet unknown, and as yet to be determined, in order that the truth may be ascertained.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
I explicitly reserve all my unalienable Rights without prejudice under Texas Rules of civil Procedures 815.
I explicitly reserve all my unalienable Rights without prejudice under Title 28 USC Section 2072(b).
I explicitly reserve all my unalienable Rights without prejudice under U. C. C. 1: 207
Executed pursuant to Title 28 USC. Section 1746 (1) this xxx day of the month of Month two-thousand-two. With full reservation of my entire natural God given substantive rights without prejudice as preserved by the State and Federal Constitutions.
My mark addressee:
State of Texas
County of Collin
This Verified Non-Negotiable Bill of Exchange declaration and its content was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, on this xxx day of the month of Month two-thousand-two by living soul Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx.
Notary: Seal:
Reply to me addressee, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx
mail location Exact: post office for the States united
Xxxxxx, Texas
Certificate of Service
Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 this xxx day of December two-thousand two A.D. to issuer KENNETH L. MAUN, and User COLLIN COUNTY, 1800 N. GRAVES ST., SUITE 170, P.O. BOX 8006, MCKINNEY, TEXAS 75070-8006 this the xxx day of Month in the year 2002 by me the holder in due course of the original with signatures and seal by notary public of which will be furnished upon request.
By me Addressee : Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx
Answer to issuer KENNETH L. MAUN, and User COLLIN COUNTY
January 21, 2002
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure.
To: KENNETH L. MAUN
Tax Assessor Collector
Collin County
1800 N. Graves Street, Suite 170
P. 0. Box 8006
McKinney, TX 75070-8006
From: me addressee, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx
mail location Exact: post office for the States united
Xxxxxx, Texas
Mr. Kenneth L. Maun, Tax Assessor Collector,
Thank you for your response but you have used my copyright to attempt to extort funds from my estate and per our contract/agreement the debt is now due.
Second you knew or should have known that the property Tax Code does not apply to my estate or me.
If you are your assign use my copyright again without my written consent you will be billed again for its use per our agreement.
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
By me, addressee Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party,
Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 this xxx day of Month
two-thousand two A.D to Kenneth L. Maun, Tax Assessor Collector
by me Addressee :
PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
February 22, 2002
County Court of Record for the people of the county of Dallas, Texas Mandated by Article 5 Section 15 as preserved by Article 1 Section 13 of the 1876 Constitution of State of Texas or any court of competent jurisdiction.
Cause Number
Addressee: Ralph, of evans
Applicant, Aggrieved Party,
living soul one of the we the people
PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Under CHAPTER 37.
Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Sec. 37.001.
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT By THE COUNTY CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF RECORD MANDATED BY ARTICLE 5 SECTION 15 AND BY AUTHORITY OF ARTICLE 1, SECTION 13, 19 and 29 OF THE 1876 Constitution of the State of Texas AND THE VII, VIII, IX AND X AMENDMENT OF THE 1787 Constitution of the united States of America or any article III court of Competent Jurisdiction.
I, Me, addressee, Ralph, of evans, a man, a living soul, the undersigned Applicant and affiant, Aggrieved Party, hereby aver and certify under penalty of perjury under Biblical Law recorded in James 5:12, by declaration that the facts stated below are true, correct, complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief, and show the court the following in compliance with ARTICLE 1 SECTION 29 of the Constitution of the State of Texas.
I, me, a living soul, the Accused, Petition the person in the office of the county court of Record judge mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the 1876 Constitution of the State of Texas for DECLARATORY JUDGMENT by said court by the law of the land.
JURISDICTION
Sec. 37.003. Power of Courts to Render Judgment; Form and Effect.
a) A court of record within its jurisdiction has power to declare rights, status, and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed. An action or proceeding is not open to objection on the ground that a declaratory judgment or decree is prayed for. This Article 5 Section 15 court is the only Court of Record authorized by the 1876 Texas Constitution. Therefore this Court has jurisdiction to rule on this Petition for DECLARATORY JUDGMENT on behalf and for me.
ARGUMENT
I, Me, am a living soul with unalienable rights protected by Article 1 the 'Bill of Rights' and preserved by Article 3 Section 62 of the 1876 Constitution for the State of Texas and the legislature has no authority in any manner affect, amend, impair, suspend, repeal or suspend my rights and the legislative statutory created courts have no jurisdiction to rule on my rights whatsoever.
RELIEF
I, me, Ralph, evans petition for order in the nature of DECLARATORY JUDGMENT that my rights are forever excepted from powers of government: To forever remain inviolate and all laws, statutes, rules, codes, ordinances, regulation, shall be void as mandated by Article 1 Section 29 of the 'Bill of Right' of the 1876 Constitution of the State of Texas. The purpose of this DECLARATORY JUDGMENT is to settle and to afford relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to rights, status, and other legal relations; and it is to be liberally construed and administered and for settlement once and for all for my on going mental pain and suffering and the status of my rights and grant any other relief this court deem just and proper.
Respectively submitted this xxx day of xxxx, 2xxx
Address: Ralph, of evans
Location: post office of the States united
Garland, Texas
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true copy of the foregoing document PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT was served by private messenger, with certificate of Service to the county court of record clerk for the county court of record of the county of Dallas, Texas state this the xxxx day of xxxxx, 2xxx.
By:
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF REVIEW
May 14, 2002
Declaration in support of petition for writ of review for vacating void Judgments, Orders and Decrees by me Ralph-kenneth family of Evans one of the people upon the Land of Texas
To: Chief Justice for
The fifth circuit Court of the united States of America
600 Camp Street
New Orleans, La. 70130
In the matter of the admiralty maritime claim number 3: 99-CV-1516-M made by the unknown and unnamed actors using a Fictitious Plaintiff against my private property as recorded in the deed records of the county of Dallas, Texas making them trespassers and claim jumpers.
Declaration in support of petition for writ of review for vacating void Judgments, Orders and Decrees by me Ralph-kenneth family of Evans one of the people upon the Land of Texas to Chief Justice of said Court.
There being no authenticated law (Constitution) in the archives of Texas that lawfully changed Texas from a Republic to a state of the United States. The actors that claim to be acting in the name of the State of Texas or THE STATE OF TEXAS are acting in fraud and are fraud artist, outlaws and criminals. All their acts are acts of fraud, criminal and outlaw without even the privileges of citizenship. All the ones that aid and abet these outlaws are also outlaws and without the privileges of citizenship making themselves foreign agents.
There is no Political Question for debate as some may claim. There is only the matter of law and there are no privileges of citizenship or immunity for violation of the law the constitution of the Republic of Texas.
The Governor, The Legislators and The Courts of The State of Texas are all a fraud. There is no authority by law for the Nation of Texas to be a State of the United States. Quote "The framers drew heavily from the Constitution of the United States and those of several of its states, but in one respect there was a basic difference in that there was to be only one state, rather than a federal system, in the Republic of Texas" from the 1836 Republic of Texas Constitution. Quote: "and shall swear to support this constitution, and that he will bear true allegiance to the republic of Texas, shall be entitled to all the privileges of citizenship from the 1836 Republic of Texas Constitution. Therefore those that claimed to have changed the Republic of Texas to a state of the United States failed to bear true allegiance to the republic of Texas, and lost all their privileges of citizenship. They being non-citizens were unable to change the Republic of Texas to a state of the United States by authority of law.
Question by Electronic Mail:
Dear Ms, Diana Houston
I have received your letter dated May 1, 2002 you claim you have no authenticated copy of the Texas Constitution. Now I ask you do you have a copy of the true and correct copy of any Constitution for the State or Republic of Texas. If so please supply me with the cost for a certified copy either hand written or typed.
(See Attached for actual Letter)
Ralph-Kenneth family of Evans
Answer by Electronic Mail: Dear Mr. Evans:
The Texas State Library and Archives Commission does not hold any copy of the Constitution which meets your criteria and we are, therefore, unable to
supply you with a copy. As I mentioned in our telephone conversation, I have no additional avenues to pursue or suggestions to make.
Diana Houston
Assistant Director, Information Services
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
Caveat
The framers authenticated the constitution of the 1836 Republic of Texas by right, they bled for that right "This declaration of rights is declared to be a part of this constitution, and shall never be violated on any pretence whatever. And in order to guard against the transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that every thing in this bill of rights contained, and every other right not hereby delegated, is reserved to the people." From the 'bill of Rights' of the1836 Constitution for the Republic of Texas.
Below is the Letter from: Diana Houston, Assistant Director, Information Services Texas State Library and Archives Commission
Letterhead of
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
Lorenzo da Zavala State Archives and Library Building
1201 Brazos Street Post Office Box 12927
Austin Texas 78711-2927
May 1,2002
Notary Public
3352 Broadway Blvd #406
Garland, TX 75043-1531
Dear Mr. Evans:
I am responding to your recent request concerning a certified copy of an authenticated copy of the Constitution of Texas.
During our conversation, you indicated an authenticated copy must meet two criteria, it must be signed by the Secretary of State and affixed with the State Seal of Texas. You also indicated that the copy must be handwritten and the date of the Constitution was irrelevant to your needs. This letter is to verify to you that no copy of the Constitutions held in the Texas State Archives meets your requirements.
I hope this information will be helpful to you,
Signed by Diana Houston
Assistant Director, Information Services
In view of the fore going;
There being no valid authority by the law of the land of Texas or its Constitution or no valid authority by law of the United States of America or its Constitution to annex the people of Texas into a the foreign jurisdiction of the Federal United States without the use of intrinsic fraud and no valid order, decree or judgment can issue or jurisdiction can be conferred by the use of intrinsic fraud. I petition this three judge panel of said Court to issue an order for void judgment and remand this claim to be tried by jury by law in the county Court of record by the people upon the land of Texas in the county of Dallas.
Pray
I the damaged party Ralph-kenneth of the family of Evans further petition the honorable judges of the three judge panel of said Court to also release the bond to me immediately and order the actors to produce the Plaintiff so I may question the Plaintiff under oath and the building code that they alleged that I violated. In the event the actors are unable to produce the building code they alleged I violated and the Plaintiff so I may examine the Plaintiff under then I petition the Court to bind them over for trial for Perjury, Commercial fraud and rights violation of me.
1. The actors allege that the Plaintiff exists in the event the actors cannot product the Plaintiff for me to examine under oath said Court must grant my petition.
2. In the event the actors cannot produce the Plaintiff then it is evident the Plaintiff don't exist and the Court has failed to have before it a valid verified complaint as required by supplemental rule for admiralty and maritime claims as required by RULE C (2), (3) or lawful process as required by Rule C (4) said Court must grant my petition.
3. The actors allege that I violated a building Code the building Code either exist or it don't exist if the actors cannot produce the building Code that they have alleged I violated then it don't exist and said Court must grant my petition.
Respectively petitioned:
By me Ralph-kenneth, family of Evans this 14th day of May 2002.
Signed
Concurring Witnesses: Signed by 12 Witnesses
Verified by Notary Public: Signed by Notary
and Sealed: 5-14-2002
COUNTY CLERK
NON-NEGOTIABLE NOTICE TO CURE AND INTENT TO SUE
May 18, 2002
Non-Negotiable Notice To Cure and Intent To Sue
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date April 13, 2002.
The PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT shall be recorded in the County Court of Record for the people of the county of (Your County), Texas Mandated by Article 5 Section 15 as preserved by Article 1 Section 13 of the 1876 Constitution of State of Texas or any court of competent jurisdiction.
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have violated my Substantive Rights.
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have violated the constitution of Texas
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have violated the constitution of The United Stated of America.
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have violated the state Law
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have violated the federal Law
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have violated the Supreme Court ruling of Arizona v. Miranda which says rules cannot abridge substantive rights. Arizona v. Miranda 'Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.'
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), took an oath to uphold the constitution. Violating your oath is perjury and that is a felony.
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have used a rule twice to deprive me of my right of recording the PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT to settle once and for all, my insecurities. I have a right to be secure.
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have 72 hours, (3 days) to cure your errors. If not a lawsuit shall be filed.
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
By me, addressee (Your Name), living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true copy of the foregoing document Non-negotiable Notice To Cure and Intent To Sue attached Notices had Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 to the county court of record clerk for the county court of record of the county of (County), Texas state this the 13th day of April, year 2002.
County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), Address, City, Zip
By: (Your Name)
COUNTY CLERK
FINAL NOTICE
NON-NEGOTIABLE NOTICE TO CURE AND INTENT TO SUE
THE COUNTY CLERK, ELECTED OFFICIAL AND/OR (CLERKS NAME)
MAY 19, 2002
Final Notice
Non-Negotiable Notice To Cure and Intent To Sue
the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name)
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date May 15, 2002.
The PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT is demanded to be recorded in the County Court of Record for the people of the county of (County), Texas Mandated by Article 5 Section 15 as preserved by Article 1 Section 13 of the 1876 Constitution of State of Texas or any court of competent jurisdiction.
The PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT is in your possession and has not been recorded. You have not responded to the Non-Negotiable Notice To Cure and Intent To Sue the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name).
Clerk's Lawful Duties per 12 Tex Jur 3d Section 11, Section 13, Section 33, Section 36, Section 37, Section 39.
* Pursuant to your 12 Tex Jur 3d at Section 11 "In addition, a clerk may not discriminate between litigants, "
* Pursuant to your 12 Tex Jur 3d at Section 13 "It is the duty of the clerk to file all papers tendered for filing and to docket all motions. The judge of the court has no control over the clerk in respect to such duties,"
* Pursuant to your 12 Tex Jur 3d at Section 33 "A clerk of court is strictly bound to the performance of the duties imposed on him by law. Failure to perform his duties renders him and the sureties on his bond liable to the one suffering loss from his failure, to the extent of the loss."
* Pursuant to your 12 Tex Jur 3d at Section 33 "A clerk of a district or county court who neglects or refuses to perform any duty required of the clerk under the statutory provisions regarding practice before such courts is liable for damages in an action by the injured person."
* Pursuant to your 12 Tex Jur 3d at Section 36 "The clerk must record without delay instruments filed with him. His failure to do so is negligence and one sustaining damage as a consequence thereof has a right of action for the breach of duty."
* Pursuant to your 12 Tex Jur 3d at Section 37 "A clerk of court may be liable to indictment and punishment for neglecting to discharge the duties imposed on him by law. A clerk, as a public servant, may be guilty of such offenses as soliciting or accepting a bribe, tampering with a governmental record, or official misconduct,"
* Pursuant to your 12 Tex Jur 3d at Section 39 "The surety on the bond given by a clerk before entering the duties of office may be liable on the default of the clerk. Misconduct of a clerk's deputies may also render the clerk's surety liable within the terms of an official bond."
* You, the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), have 72 hours, (3 days) to cure your errors. If not a lawsuit shall be filed to have you removed from office and your bond forfeited for your unlawful act for making judicial determinations affecting my right without authority.
TRCP 815 SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS UNAFFECTED: These rules shall not be construed to enlarge or diminish any substantive rights or obligations of any parties to any civil action.
McLendon v. McLendon, 847 S.W.2d 601, 608 (Tex App.-Dallas 1992, writ denied). "[T]he supreme court's rulemaking power may not [adopt rules that] 'abridge, enlarge, or modify the substantive rights of a litigant.' "
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
By me, addressee (Your Name), living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party,
(Your Name),
post office of the States united
City, Texas
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true copy of the foregoing document Final Notice Non-negotiable Notice To Cure and Intent To Sue had Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 to the county court of record clerk for the county court of record of the county of (County), Texas state this the 15th day of May, year 2002. County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), Address, City, Texas Zip.
(County) county Commissioners and (County) County Judge, Elected Official, Address, City, Texas Zip via Regular Mail
By: (Your Name)
Cc (County) county Commissioners and (County) County Judge.
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF BOND
COUNTY CLERK
MAY 26, 2002
Notice of Failure to Record PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT in the County Court of Record for the people of the county of (County), Texas Mandated by Article 5 Section 15 as preserved by Article 1 Section 13 of the 1876 Constitution of State of Texas or any court of competent jurisdiction.
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date May 28, 2002.
Their Name Their Name
Insurance Insurance Company
Address, City, Zip Address, City, Zip
cc: County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name)
Address,
City, Zip
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 24: DUTY OF CLERK
When a petition is filed with the clerk he shall indorse thereon the file number, the day on which it was filed and the time of filing, and sign his name officially thereto.
Biffle v. Morton Rubber Indus., Inc., 785 S.W.2d 143, 144 (Tex.1990).
"An instrument is deemed in law filed at the time it is delivered to the clerk, regardless of whether the instrument is filemarked."
JAMES v. KENTUCKY, 466 US 341, 80 LED 2d 346, 104 SCt. 1830 (1984)
The supreme court held that State statutes did not take precedent over constitutional law.
No Facts are in dispute concerning the County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name). You have (Clerks Name), the County Clerk for the county of Collin, Texas, bonded. Please forward the forfeited bond to (your Name) immediately.
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
By me, (your Name), living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party,
(your Name)
post office of the States united,
City, Texas state.
Notices to (Clerks Name) are attached.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true copy of the foregoing document Notice of Forfeiture of Bond had Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 to (Their Name) (Insurance Company), and the county court of record clerk for the county court of record of the county of (County), Texas state this the 28h day of May, year 2002.
County Clerk, Elected Official and/or (Clerks Name), Address, City, Zip.
(Their Name), (Insurance Company), Address, City, Zip
By: (Your Name)
Non Negotiable Notice and Demand Discovery
July 8, 2002
Non-negotiable Notice and Demand Discovery
for public information
GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 552. PUBLIC INFORMATION
SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 552.001.
Added by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 268, Section 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
And
Notice of Acceptance of Offer and Contract in Commerce in law
Non-negotiable Notice and Demand for payment for the unauthorized use of my recorded copyright. Recorder number 1039813 per the terms of the previous accepted contract and agreement for use of copyrights as recorded in the public records for county of Dallas, Texas previously sent to you.
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure.
July 8, 2002
To: Issuers ROCKWALL COUNTY and
All corporate directors of said corporation also known as Commissioners
101 S Fannin CO Annex,
Rockwall, Texas 75087-3700 and
LINEBARGER HEARD GOGGIN BLAIR GRAHAM PENA & SAMPSON & LLP
P. O. BOX 65917
SAN ANTONIO TEXAS 78265
And
To: PERSON in Charge of ROCKWALL CENTRAL APPRAISAL DIST.
841 JUSTIN RD
ROCKWALL TEXAS 75087 and
LINEBARDER GOGGAN BLAIR PENA & SAMPSON, LLP
P. O. BOX 65917
SAN ANTONIO TEXAS 78265
Your papers undated and unsigned were forwarded to me the holder in due course of said property as named in your NOTICE OF TAX LIEN. From your papers it is evident that your intent is to use my copyrights again in an attempt to extract value from by estate for your own self-enrichment using fraudulent commercial paper by fraudulent commercial process and deceptive trade practices. We have a contract agreement recorded in the county of Dallas deed records, which you have agreed and it is in full force and effect. So there is no misunderstanding I will restate part of the contract/agreement for your benefit. If you are anyone uses my copyrights to extract anything of value from my estate each of you issuers and users are to pay me one million dollars of silver specie in coin of the United States of America as mandated by Article 1 Section 10 of the 1787 Constitution for the United States of America for each use.
If it was not your intent to extract value from my estate using my copyright notify me immediately within five days of receipt of the notice signed under the penalty of perjury. If you fail to notify me within Five (5) days consider this as another Non-negotiable Notice and Bill for ten (10) million United States dollars of silver specie added to your previous debt to me for use of my copyrights.
Executed pursuant to the laws of the United States of America this 8,day of July 2002 by me,
Ralph, family of Evans holder in due course.
Non-negotiable Notice and Demand for Clarification
September 17, 2002
Non-negotiable Notice and Demand for Clarification
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date January 00, 2002.
To:
Their Name, THEIR NAME
DEPUTY COURT CLERK
xxx-3 DISTRICT COURT-LOCATION
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE ZIP
From: me, addressee,
Your Name
address
City, State ZIP
A 'NOTICE TO APPEAR' number DC-0-00-0000000-GC dated 00/0/02 was addressed to my Copyrighted Fiction and was received 00/00/02. Who do you want to appear at xxx-3 DISTRICT COURT on DAY, MONTH 00, 2002? Demand for full disclosure requires you to advise who is required to be in court, my copyrighted fiction YOUR NAME FICTION or the living soul Your Name.
You have 10 days to respond to the Non-negotiable Notice and Demand for Clarification
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
Executed pursuant to Title 28 USC. Section 1746 (1) this 15th day of the month of Month two-thousand-two. With full reservation of my entire natural God given substantive rights without prejudice as preserved by the State and Federal Constitutions.
My mark addressee: Your Name
Certificate of Service
Service by Registered Mail RR 000 000 000 US this 00th day of January, two-thousand two A.D. to issuer XXXXXXXXX and user XXXXXXXXX located at xxx-3 DISTRICT COURT-XXX, ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP this the 00th day of Month in the year 2002.
By me Addressee : Your Name
All Accounts and correspondence must be addressed to me
September 18, 2002
Non-negotiable Notice and Demand
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure this date Month 13, 2002.
To: Issuer: First Last Name To: User: FIRST LAST NAME
Address User: First Last Name
Suite xxxx User: FIRST LAST NAME
City, Texas [75000]
Reference: Account Number PE 000000 and Account Number PE 000000
All Accounts and correspondence must be addressed to me, First M Last Name.
FIRST M LAST NAME (and all derivatives thereof) is a Copyrighted Fictional character and my private property. See attached Notice of Deeded Copyright.
You have used my Copyright. As a matter of fact they have used my Copyright to transfer Assets belonging to me to my Copyright.
I did not give you permission to transfer assets from me, First M Last Name , to my Copyright.
You may not use my Copyright because it has been removed from commerce and you may not put it back into commerce. Do not use FIRST M LAST NAME (and all derivatives thereof) in commerce! You have to deal with me and I am First M Last Name .
As Evidence and Proof you know the difference, I received one letter with my name First M Last Name Upper and Lower case letter and another with the funds transferred to my Copyrighted Fictional character FIRST M LAST NAME in All Capital letters
FIRST M LAST NAME is my property and I have removed it from Commerce.
All Assets must be put into my account under my name First M Last Name .
You have to deal with me, living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party First M Last Name .
If for any reason in the future, my Copyrighted private property is used in any way by you or the company you represent without my written permission, a Bill will be forwarded to you under the terms and condition for their use of my Deeded copyright per the recorded copyright contract/agreement.
Any transfer of funds from my account First M Last Name to the Fiction FIRST M LAST NAME will be evidence of criminal conversion of credit of the United States.
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this notice.
Notice to the Principal is notice to the agent applies to this notice.
By me, addressee Your Name , living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party,
Service by CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Form 3817 this 13th day of Month two-thousand two A.D. to issuer xxxxxxxx, and User xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
by me Addressee :
|
|
|
Transcription - Copyright - Its All in the NAME
Posted: September 27, 2002
Ken Evans Video Presentation
Ralph Kenneth Evans
Lewis Thompson Mohr
http://micromann.freeservers.com
http://trcp.freeservers.com
http://wtplc.freeservers.com
Recognize at the outset that you are dealing with a bunch of criminals who have abandoned their responsibilities as agents of the people by vacating the government and becoming a corporation to advance the commercial interests of the world. They attempt to make a corporation out of you, too, by writing your Christian appellation in all-capital letters, which is a clear prejudice against you, according to;
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (TCRP) Rule 52, Alleging a Corporation:
"Allegations that a corporation is incorporated shall be taken as Truth unless denied by affidavit of the adverse party, his agent or his attorney, whether such corporation is public or private and however created."
Take note of the words "however created" because when those attorneys write your name in all-capital letters on a summons or warrant or notice, you have now been constituted as a corporation. Your name was similarly corrupted when a constructive trust was established as you volunteered into Social Security, making you part of the national socialist democracy and assigning you an employee I.D. number (SSAN). TCRP Rules 53 and 54 affirm the notion that if someone alleges that you are a corporation and you do not deny it in a timely manner, you are an indeed a corporation for the commercial matter in question. Checking the definition of "name" in Bouvies law dictionary, we find that if;
1) the opposing side does NOT use your Christian appellation, and;
2) you do NOT make an appearance, and;
3) you do NOT waive process-then they have NO jurisdiction over you.
One method of obtaining control over the all-capital letter fiction is to file a UCC-1 financing statement with the secretary of state. Another is to bring that fiction under your domain as private intellectual property through a copyright, which enjoys the protection of common law when made a part of the public record with the local county recorder. (Copyright law existed before the modern statute was created.) Compare this with a trademark, which is not a common law document since it comes under statutory law.
The mandate since 1935 from Washington is that all the state governments standardize their state rules, procedures and statutes. References given here use the Texas code, however there are equivalent sections in each of the other state rulebooks from which to derive similar authority.
TRCP Rule 52 was cited in Galleria Bank vs. Southwest Properties, 498 Southwest 2nd, page 5, as follows:
"The failure of an adverse party [i.e. you] to deny under oath the allegation that he is incorporated dispenses with the necessity of proof of the fact."
So, when you receive a presentment (bill, citation, tax bill, lawsuit, summons), you are alleged to be a corporation simply by how your Christian appellation is styled (all-capital letters) on the presentment. If you consent to that allegation by remaining silent during the time given for responding, it amounts to acceptance of your corporate status (acquiescence by silence). The fact that the opposition puts a case number or file reference or license number on the presentment constitutes a claim number that completes the process of creating a private corporation without your awareness. Thus, for that particular matter, you are presumed to be a corporation unless you rebut it (contest it) with an affidavit sworn under penalties of perjury.
RULE: Never accept a presentment without contesting it, but remember that the ONLY thing you want to contest is the "style of the case," i.e. the corruption of your Christian appellation into a corporate fiction form.
To argue anything else in the pleading (even a contention that you are an ax murderer) instantly causes you to traverse into the opposition's jurisdiction-and you're dead!
By the opposition successfully alleging that you are a corporation, you become caught in a Catch-22. Commercial courts cannot deal with flesh-and-blood People-they deal only with legal fictions (ACTORS) and you are entirely out of place in a commercial court unless they somehow manage to join you, the Living Soul, with a corporation (ACTOR), which is how the court obtains jurisdiction over you. However, corporations cannot speak for themselves; they depend upon an attorney to be their mouthpiece and represent them before the court. You have NO STANDING before the court, not being a member of the BAR, and thus cannot speak for the legal fiction (ACTOR) whose name sounds exactly like yours (idem sonans). For you to attempt a court appearance perpetrates fraud upon the court and NOTHING you say or file with the court may be recognized or heard, in spite of your best intentions and most diligent efforts. The judge will take silent notice of this immediately. Hiring an attorney only complicates issues because it makes you a ward of the court (incompetent to handle your own affairs) AND it compromises your interests (attorneys are officers of the court whose first allegiance is to the court and not to their clients). Representing yourself pro se is no solution, either, unless you conveniently happen to be a member of the BAR (perish the thought!).
Having traversed down the slippery slope, which leads to your own destruction, it is virtually impossible to then reverse course and disassociate yourself from the legal fiction (ACTOR). Once you've PROVED you are a fraud by agreeing to be a corporation, a powerful principal of law rules your affairs: "No truth can come from a fraud". Avoid that slippery slope in the first place by declaring, "That's not me!" as your AUTOMATIC RESPONSE to any presentment, oral or written, where the ACTOR'S name is used instead of your Christian appellation. "I don't know whose name you have there, but that's not me!"
WARNING: Your declaration of "That's not me!" needs to be made by affidavit when it is to become a part of an official record. Refer to Dr. Pepper Company v. Crowe, 621 SW 2nd 466, which held as follows:
Plaintiff pled defendant as a corporation. Defendant did not deny by verified pleading pursuant to TRCP 52 and 93 that he was not a corporation. Thus, such fact was established. Presentments may be handled in any of three ways:
1. Write "This is not me" in red ink diagonally across the face of the instrument and return it to the sender.
2. Write "No such entity exists" in red ink diagonally across the face of the instrument and return it to the sender.
3. First, record a copyright of the ACTOR'S name and then pursue discovery with the sender of the presentment: Inquire whether the sender is making a claim against your copyright and, if so, how they propose to handle the cost of such a claim (one million dollars in United States silver coin per use per issuer). (The presumption is that the sender is using the ACTOR'S name in an attempt to extract something from your estate.) Claims for unlawful use of the copyright fall under common law and not under the commercial statutes regulating negotiable instruments and contracts. Therefore silver specie may be demanded in any settlement, instead of Federal Reserve notes or credit instruments of the United States.
The Texas Penal Code Articles 1.03, 1.04 and 1.07 (and similar language in each of the other states' code) says that the only crime, which may be committed, by one of the People is a common law crime. People are not "violators" of civil statutes. When someone sends a presentment, they are contending that there is a contract on file somewhere and that one of the People is a "violator" of some civil statute. "Violators" are persons, which includes inanimate entities like corporations, trusts, legal fictions and ACTORS, but does not include People (Living Souls). The subterfuge is confusing until you realize that they are operating in two separate venues-one for legal fictions and the other for real People. The People's venue is in the common law, which is based upon the constitution and runs with the land. The corporate government, in order to function, has codified a lot of the rights of the People into statutes, which they attempt to enforce under the presumption that the People have agreed to be treated as corporations. The statutory side is the face that they show to the People in order to distract and deceive-and thereby controls them.
In 1935, the Social Security Act came into being. It provided that if one of the People voluntarily enrolled in Social Security and received a number, he was deemed to be an employee of the government. The State of Texas, as a subsidiary corporation of the United States Inc. (Title 28, Section 3002 15 et sequel), can thus point to a man's Social Security contract to substantiate their contention that the man has become a person (ACTOR) and an employee of the state corporation, subject to being regulated and controlled by the statutes. As said before, People cannot commit violations unless they agreed to do something by contract. However, a contract may be invalidated if it was entered into without full disclosure-which is almost always the case in these entanglements with the state.
The Penal Code sets punishments for violations but it also provides a legal remedy for the People. People CANNOT avail themselves of the remedy if they acquiesce to being a legal fiction corporation/employee), so it is important to first gain control of the all-capital letter ACTOR'S name by means of a common law copyright and remove it from commerce so the state cannot use it against you. This is the highest form of title one can possess once the recorder's office attaches a deed number. With a copyright in hand, a man has returned control of his life to himself and out of the hands of the state. Anyone coming against the ACTOR after that point is required to post a bond equal to double the value of the copyright property before commencing action.
NOTE: Occasionally, a county recorder will resist the idea of recording your papers by contending that you cannot copyright your own name-and the recorder would be correct in that contention. There is no way to copyright your Christian name (upper-lower case appellation). However, the name that is being recorded for copyright is NOT your Christian name-it is the moniker of the alleged fiction, the corporation or ACTOR, whose name just happens to sound like yours. Furthermore, your papers are being submitted to the common law side of the recorder's office which recording takes precedence over statutory process. Be aware that a man can copyright ANY of the fruits of his labor, whether it be from his hands or his mind, and thereby protect those fruits for his own exclusive use by withdrawing them from commerce and the public domain.
IMPORTANT: Use care in selecting your terms. "File" a statutory term. "Record" is a common law term. The copyright is private intellectual property "recorded for public notice."
The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (TCCP) in Section 1.14 Waiver of Rights, says: "The defendant in a criminal prosecution for any offense may waive any rights secured to him by law. If he does not object to a defect, error or irregularity of form or substance in the indictment or the information before the date of the trial, he waives and forfeits the rights to object to the irregularity on appeal." So, if you argue anything except "That's not me!" in response to a presentment, you're dead! If you accept the contention that you're a corporation, you've acquiesced to being treated like a corporation-and you are finished. You are absolutely guilty of whatever they say you are because they run the courts. Your only defense is owning title to the ACTOR'S name-by copyright. Get control of your legal fiction and then you can get control of your life.
Do not ever answer to the all-capital letter name. Always object. If someone announces that they have service for you, respond with "Let me see the paperwork. Oh, that's not me." Avoid entanglements with the state. You have no rights in any statutory corporation court. You only have statutory privileges and immunities. The People are the created ones. The government serves the People to the People's benefit. If you allow yourself to be contracted into their statutory venue as a corporation, then you are going to have to abide by the fact that they have all the rules in their favor and that you have no rights. Once you assert your rights that you are one of the People, there are a number of things you can do to help your court case to make certain that you will win on appeal. The Texas Rules of Criminal Procedure in Section 1.27 states that the common law governs. If the statutory code fails to provide a rule of procedure in any particular state of case, the rules of common law shall apply.
If, from the outset, you establish that you are NOT that legal fiction, then that case does NOT apply to you; instead, the rules of common law apply. You may force them to move the case into a venue in which the common law prevails Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Section 257 and 259), back into the venue of the People, to wit: A change of venue may be granted in civil cases upon a motion by either party supported by his own affidavit and the affidavit of three credible persons, residents of the county in which the suit is pending. (NOTE: The granting of a petition to move the case is usually automatic, unless some agent from the government corporation objects under penalty of perjury that a fair trial by a jury by due course of the law of the land can indeed be found In a court of equity-not likely, since your affidavit becomes the judgment unless rebutted point-for-point. If rebutted, the affidavit must be tried under the rules of common law, which must be heard by a jury in the county court for the People. This is because a remedy for a common law controversy cannot be heard in an equity court.) For an example of removal of a case to common law court, see: Lone Star Steel Company vs. Scott.
PETITION IN REMOVAL
"I am not that fiction on the warrant or information that was served upon me. I am one of the People and a living soul. I am not a corporation. I demand my remedy in the court of the People in the county court of record. I petition the court to remove Case No. 121212 from admiralty court under contract law into the county court for the People under common law."
Equal footing doctrine (under the full faith and credit provisions of the federal constitution) says you may import Texas law into your state and Texas law will have standing (to govern) in your case.
Refuse to give your "name": ...The omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant in a legal process prevents the court from acquiring jurisdiction, there being no other description or identification or appearance or waiver of process. -- Bouvies Law Dictionary, 8th Edition. See: Boyington vs. Chamberlain, 38 Texas 604; Thompson vs. McCorkle, 136 Indiana 484 NE Reporter 813.
All crimes are commercial crimes with commercial remedies. Penal code violations are NOT crimes. Prior to 1939, there were four causes of action in the courts: civil, penal, criminal and admiralty. After the "Great Combining" in 1939, the only cause remaining was civil action in equity. (FRCP Rule 2, Title 28). Constant throughout the ages is the 7th Amendment to the constitution, which preserves the right of the People to a common law venue. Any "crime" with a monetary value of more than attached to it entitles the accused to due process under the common law. (One day in jail is normally worth more than .) In Texas, all criminal action must be dealt with under the common law where the People have sovereign immunity. If you remember to avail yourself of the constitutional remedy codified in the Rules of Criminal Procedure, you discover you do have a legal leg to stand on. Even attorneys have rights under the common law. In a disbarment action, an attorney may petition to have his case heard in the county court of record (common law court).
Mandatory steps to taking back control of your legal life:
1. Copyright the name of your legal fiction.
2. On receiving any presentment, respond automatically with "That's not me!"
3. Find the remedy in your own state statute or code to counter the action being brought against you and FILE THAT REMEDY in your own real name. "The fiction in which the case is styled is not Me. I, am really Me, a living soul, one of the sovereign People of the several states united. I demand to move the case into my venue where the People have remedy-in common law."
A landmark case for establishing who the People are is Kemper vs. State, 138 Southwest 1025 (issued in 1911), which says on Page 1043, Section 33: One sovereign does not need to tell another sovereign that he is sovereign. The sovereign is merely sovereign by his very existence. The rule in America is that the American people are the sovereigns.
You have the right as a sovereign to control both sides of your life, the common law (private) side and the statutory (public) side where you engage in contracts with others. The presumption of contracts lacks full disclosure, but if you don't know who you are you are going to innocently accept a piece of paper with your capitalized name and, whether you like it or not, you will be captured into a statutory venue to be treated like a corporation and manipulated to the prejudice of your own best interests. You are one of the sovereign People. You have a right to copyright your Capitalized NAME.
There is an insidious aspect to the states becoming corporations in order to execute public policy. We have grown used to seeing the activities of the Texas, a Republic carried out under the banner of The State of Texas (a corporation). The Powers That Be may have gone one step further in the development of the corporate fiction than the state constitution and the statutes actually permit, because we now see the corporation styled in legal documents as THE STATE OF TEXAS, which has no foundation in law or statute nor is the all-capital letter name registered with the Secretary of State of Texas. This amounts to a fictitious plaintiff, which leads to the possibility that some band of international rogues may have stolen even our de facto corporate government from us. See Baldauf vs. Nathan Russell, 96 Atlantic Recorder, Page 96 (88 NJ law 303) which says under Abatement and Plea in Abatement-Fictitious Party: The defense that a plaintiff is a fictitious person attacks the capacity of the plaintiff to commence or continue the suit and is properly the subject of a plea in abatement.
Under the TCCP, the state only has the authority move process under The State of Texas. It appears, however, that today all of their process is running as THE STATE OF TEXAS, which may prove to be a fictitious plaintiff. This amounts to a colossal fraud upon the People, requiring the collusion of judges, the admiralty court system, the Bar Association, the attorneys general, the district attorneys and all the corporate officers who are supposed to be answerable to the People. It amounts to abdication of office in order to go over to some fictitious venue for which there is no foundation in law. Furthermore, a fictitious plaintiff is a fraud upon the court because it goes beyond his or her own code. Every accused man should notice the court of that fraud and demand his remedy.
The state corporation has co-opted the state constitution for use as their corporate charter. The label on the front may say TEXAS CONSTITUTION, but notice the all-capitalized style being employed in the title (subtle hint). The legislative council is responsible for the care and upkeep of this document, assisting the house and senate in their capacity of board of directors of the state corporation while they impersonate officers of The State of Texas. Taking these criminals to task for their deeds is nigh unto impossible, so long as they control all of the courts. Additional evidence that the CONSTITUTION is nothing more than a commercial charter is seen by realizing that it may be amended at the whim of registered voters who are voting their interests as members of the national socialist democracy. Organic dejure law may be changed only by property owners who are qualified electors, not by persons of diminished capacity possessing social security numbers.
The only crimes, which may be legitimately prosecuted against the People at common law, are for;
1) causing injury to another one of the People;
2) damaging your neighbor's property, and;
3) violating the rule that your word is your bond. On the other hand, if you venture into commerce and make a contract, you become bound by the terms of that contract under the Law Merchant.
Citizens who obtain a voter's registration card become members of the County Corporation. You join the socialist democracy when you apply for a social security number and become an employee of the corporate state.
If you know that you are one of the sovereign People and you have taken control of your alleged commercial entity (ACTOR), where do you go for remedy? The opposition has closed all of the People's courts. However, they cannot take them away-by law. The state constitution (corporate charter) identifies the county court which is a court of record consisting of 12 justices called from among the People and presided over by a magistrate who keeps order and maintains the seal of the court. The presiding magistrate serves as chief justice of this One Supreme Court, moving in common law. Notice that the United States Supreme Court is NOT the One Supreme Court, as we have been led to believe, having jurisdiction only over federal officers and employees in Washington, DC and the federal territories.
Since most of the contracts which imperil your standing in law were entered into voluntarily (social security, driver license, marriage license, voter registration), making you an employee of the state corporation and a member of the socialist democracy, consider volunteering OUT of the same contracts to restore your sovereign status under a republican form of government.
Article 5, Section 28 of the Texas constitution speaks to the issue of filling vacancies in the "superior court" which only exists in the counties. Know what court in which you have remedy. Apply that remedy, whether the opposition pays attention or not, by creating documents to cite applicable law and statutes that codify your contention that "That's not me-I'm not that THING." You have the right to make dilatory pleas and point out their errors. What are their errors?
1) That's not me on that piece of paper.
2) In fact, that's not YOU on that piece of paper. (Recall the fictitious plaintiff that has no foundation in either the constitution or the statutes.)
Don't go into their courts; simply return their process to them with an appropriate notation. Remember that if;
1) the opposing side does NOT use your Christian appellation, and;
2) you do NOT make an appearance, and;
3) you do NOT waive process-then they have NO jurisdiction over you. Don't argue on behalf of or against the ACTOR or the charges-it's of no consequence and you risk traversing into their jurisdiction. The only issue is "That's not me!"
The ACTOR, being a fiction, has no capacity to speak, or write, or act, or pay fines, or serve time in jail. For those purposes, the system needs a real live man to step forward and agree to become the agent for the ACTOR, thus responsible to the principal to indemnify the obligations of the fiction (see "indemnifying party" and "accommodating party" in the Uniform Commercial Code). The system convicts the fiction and the live man serves time in jail! The state creates the fraud, but a real, live man must agree to it for it to be carried to execution.
The military, by reporting to the civil authority, is supposed to come in and protect the People when the court and legislative systems break down. There are powerful forces arrayed on the other side, whose very existence depends upon their continued ability to fleece the sheep. They won't relinquish power or control easily. Taking back the system has to begin somewhere and the starting point is for the People to record affidavits into the county record with copy to the government, which then become the basis for prosecuting actions in law. An affidavit, properly recorded, holds as much sway as a grand jury indictment. (The county attorney referred to in the Texas constitution is not the district attorney-it's one of the people.)
The state grand jury can only indict for misdemeanors because that's the only thing over which a district court has jurisdiction. If a felony is involved, it must by law be handled in the county court (common law). That's why cases are moved to contract law (equity courts) where the state attaches criminal penalties to civil contracts. The penal code is civil so that they may take felonies into the district court. Reason: They don't have constitutional or statutory authority to deal with one of the People charged with a felony in a state district court. So, how do they get jurisdiction? They claim that that the real man is an ACTOR (corporation) and an employee of the government, just like all judges, prosecuting attorneys, clerks and officers are ACTORS and employees. Unless the claim is rebutted, the real man finds that he has contracted away his right to a republican form of government and joined the socialist democracy with responsibility to adhere to the rules of the corporation and opportunity to enjoy a perceived benefit. It's all in the NAME.
The copyright is your private property and it is your right to get it recorded with the county recorder. Challenge the reluctance of any county recorder to accept your paperwork by citing Section 5407 and 5408 of Revised Statutes of the United States, 1st session, 43rd Congress, 1873 -1874 (see website for sanctions available for non-compliance with duties to record). The clerk has NO right to make a judicial determination on whether to accept or reject your papers. That determination would have to come by convening a common law court and have 12 justices rule on the issue.
The legal fiction is an ACTOR, a corporation, an employee, a Strawman-it's all of those things-but, it's not you! However, so long as you have NOT staked your claim to its exclusive use, the world of commerce will infringe on it for their purposes. But, once you copyright the legal fiction and remove it from the public domain, the use of that property without your permission will cost the user a price, which you set in the public record when recording your copyright.
A discussion of idem sonans is appropriate. It means "sounding the same or alike" and is the means by which the real man is tricked into answering to the illegal conversion of his Christian appellation (name). When a case is called in court by the bailiff announcing the defendant's name, he is reading the all-capital name of the ACTOR (corporation) which SOUNDS exactly like the real man's name but is NOT his name. The natural reaction is to respond by walking forward. The moment the real man enters the bar; he has just left the venue of the People and entered the admiralty court, where by presumption of contract he comes under some obligation to obey a statutory code, rule or regulation and that he failed to comply with it. Idem sonans amounts to criminal conversion (contract made without your consent and lacking full disclosure) that is willful, malicious and deceptive trade practice. The opposition assumes that you will not know the truth, will traverse to that fiction and will automatically be captured into their venue-and be the means to creating additional revenue to fund the state machine.
So, how does one avoid falling into the idem sonans snare? One way is to file a petition for an identity hearing-in advance-to clarify which party the opposition really want to appear in court. This is a deal killer for them because, if they make truthful disclosure, it exposes their fraud. (You can help dissuade them from proceeding by attaching a copy of your recorded copyright when you file your petition.)
Any attempt by a real man to appear in court is foolhardy. The ACTOR is the one on trial and he needs legal representation (a BAR attorney) to mount a defense. The real man, not being a BAR attorney, cannot come into the court without permission and thus he cannot speak for the ACTOR. Nothing the real man attempts to put into the record will have any effect. The judge and the opposing attorney will take silent notice of the fraud the real man is attempting to perpetrate on the court, but no one will tell him the reality of the situation. Result: The ACTOR is recorded as NOT having appeared and nobody made a legitimate appearance for the ACTOR, which leads the court to award a declaratory judgment in favor of the opposition. Nothing can stop this process because real man cannot object without having a BAR card. Even if the judge wanted to rule in the ACTOR'S favor, he cannot, being constrained by the rules that govern the court. HINT: If you want to go into their court, first get a BAR card and obtain standing with the court.
Stay out of their courts! Only attorneys can appear in their courts. They are moving by contract and statute and regulation, not law. If invited to appear, choose to abstain.
1. Send their citation back within 72 hours, with an appropriate notation.
Wait for a warrant.
2. Receive the warrant and insist without hesitation, "That's not me!"
3. If taken into custody, be prepared to contest jurisdiction when asked to give your name. The correct response is, "I am me." When queried about being JOHN DOE, you respond, "I'm not the JOHN DOE you have on your paperwork. I am me. Do you have a claim against me? Do you know anyone who has a claim against me?" They can't have a claim against you because they don't have title to you, like they do have title to the ACTOR (unless you have recorded your copyright).
4. Who is the bondholder indemnifying the case? "I claim the bond because I own the property as evidenced by title to a deed recorded in the county."
5. I own exclusive title to the ACTOR being charged in the action. What commercial purpose do you have for that ACTOR and how do you propose to pay for the privilege? The fee is one million United States silver dollars per use per issuer.
6. Resist the urge to sign a bond for your release. You are signing a contract whereby you agree to hire an attorney and give up all your rights. Even if a friend agrees to post a cash bond, you the accused are asked to sign the bond prior to release. A proper response might be, "No thanks. I don't contract with demons."
Send a bill to anyone infringing on your copyright without permission. Typically, a presentment involves two parties, assuming an attorney is in the picture, so the minimum fee is two million silver dollars. Wait 30 days to receive payment and then record an Affidavit of Non-Payment, with your bill attached, into the county recorder's office. (An unrebutted affidavit becomes a judgment nihil dicit after 30 days and you don't need a court to collect on it.) In this way, you are generating paperwork in their venue, which will eventually be noticed by the bonding companies who indemnify the actions of government employees. The bond company may refuse to renew coverage at some point because of unacceptable risk. Without a bond, a government employee cannot fulfill the duties of his office and conduct his commercial business.
Nihil dicit means that when a party is under the obligation to respond and cannot-or does not, you have created a controversy, which can only be settled in a common law court (nonexistent) and that puts the opposition in a severe bind. You can add fuel to the fire by filing a criminal complaint charging deceptive trade practice through the fraudulent use of commercial paper and fraudulent commercial process. It is up to the court to determine what the criminal penalties amount to, however, by your bill and affidavit, you have already set the civil penalty at one million silver dollars-plus. The opposition is caught between a rock and a hard place because they cannot legitimately answer or dispute your claim and it becomes a judgment by their silence. "You have used my copyright without my permission to extort some benefit or money or property from my personal estate and I am lodging a claim for damages. I have taken steps to protect my estate and you have used my copyright without my permission and you owe me one million silver dollars."
Maxim of law: "For the defacto officer to have the presumption of office, there must first be the dejure office." This means that the government may not wish to use the constitution or deal with real law-but their lifeblood is determined ultimately by their adherence to the law. They will get as far away from real law as the People will allow, but at some point they have to answer to the law because they know they cannot exist without the dejure office being there. So, when affidavits alleging crimes against the People begin to pile up, it will begin to have a snowball effect.
The highest form of complaint (even higher than a grand jury indictment) is a sworn affidavit placed into the public record by one of the sovereign People. Actions commence in the county court (common law) by affidavit of the sovereign. There is no need for a grand jury to be convened and no cause for the police to go out and investigate-all that's required is for a sovereign to write an affidavit and declare, "This crime occurred to me" and put it into the county recorder's office. Already, we have seen decisions to resign made by a number of recalcitrant Texas public officers in lieu of contesting the complaints made against them. It is incumbent upon each of us to refuse to allow public officers to get away with their crimes and to hold the truth up to their face at every opportunity. We have got to start asserting our rights and the way we do that is to take control of the presumption that we have a commercial identity (ACTOR) that belongs to them and for which they make us the indemnifying party. When you copyright that ACTOR, you take away their power. By not answering to that fiction, you take away their power. By sending them a bill every time they use the ACTOR'S name without your permission, the accumulating weight of the civil and criminal affidavits that lie in the county recorder's office will take Away their power. They will have to come back and be responsive to the People.
Once your copyright is recorded, you have the ability to stop the progress of cases being brought against you. You load the record with affidavits and counter every move of the opposition. This may not halt the psychological warfare they wage against you and, at some point; you may be intimidated into hiring an attorney. You do this at your own peril because the judge will likely order your attorney (an officer of the court) to purge offensive documents from the records-and you will have nothing to say about it-to be replaced with documents of the attorney's choosing. A better way to go is to stand before the court as yourself and to always proclaim, "I am me. I'm not that fiction or any other entity on God's green earth. I am only me."
The Christian name (title) given to you when you were born is your "address". If questioned as to your address, it is proper to respond, "You may address me as Ralph. I am Me." "Ralph" is not your mailing location; it is your address. If they attempt to label you a resident, declare that you are an inhabitant. Inhabitants have domiciles, not residences. Where do you live? You live in your body, where else? You SIGN NOTHING that is placed before you unless you understand the full implication of the act. By giving your name to someone else, you relinquish title over yourself. By giving your date of birth, you relinquish your birthright. With neither title to yourself nor your birthright, you have given over total control of yourself to others. Remember the trickery perpetrated with idem sonans. The cop in the processing section, the property office clerk, the guard in the prison-are all in on the ruse to get you to traverse to being the fiction. If successful, they own you and you become a ward of the state. "I can't give you my name (my title) because then I wouldn't have one. I can't give you the date of my birth without giving up my birthright." All judges, prosecuting attorneys, policemen, and officers of the court are ACTORS with jurisdiction only over other ACTORS (employees of the government)-unless you give them permission to exercise jurisdiction over you.
Get the common law copyright of the fiction recorded with your county. Remove that ACTOR from commerce. It is the highest title over yourself you can possess. You own yourself at that point. You determine who will use that fiction and when and at what price. It is the ultimate device for protecting yourself. It is more powerful-and more useful-than a UCC-1 because the copyright is under the common law. The UCC-1 comes under the commercial code, which may be changed without notice and is overseen by attorneys who are the fiduciaries for the corporate bankruptcy. They all work for the bankers and they're primary job is to collect the debt.
Find your remedy for anything that occurred within the boundaries of your county in the venue of the county court (common law). Remember that none of the People have rights under the Constitution of the United States, which is a compact between the several States and the United States. Your rights are preserved by the local contract, which is your state constitution. The federal Bill of Rights does not apply to you, except where it has been replicated in your state constitution. Neither does the federal government have authority over you, unless you are a resident in a federal enclave or become a federal employee (social security contract). So, the feds cannot put you in their prison-unless you volunteer. One way of volunteering is to speak improperly at allocution (time of sentencing). When the judge asks if you know of any reason why he should not pass sentence, you had better jump to your feet and speak with as much conviction as you can manage;
"Yes sir, I know SEVERAL reasons why you should not pass sentence!
FOR THE RECORD, that fiction listed on your paperwork is NOT Me! You can sentence that fiction to anything you please-if you think you have title to him. But, you do NOT have title to Me, so you cannot do anything to Me-and I do NOT give you permission to do anything except dismiss the case and discharge all charges with prejudice! Furthermore, there is evidence of fraud and collusion on the part of the prosecution who has brought an action in the name of a fictitious plaintiff. This is an equity court and you either move by contract or by title. I don't have any contract with you and I know for certain that you don't own me nor am I your slave. I am a living soul and NOT a corporation or a fictitious creation of the state. Furthermore, I am NOT an employee of any government corporation. I am ME. I claim subject matter jurisdiction and in personam jurisdiction for myself alone and I refuse to relinquish either jurisdiction to you. So, you cannot fine me or put me in jail.
I demand to be released immediately!"
* * * * *
Send Comments to wtplc@lycos.com
Get a copy of the Video: Copyright - Its All in the NAME for a suggested donation of 15.00.
A sample copyright instrument suitable for recordation will be included, if you request it.
Mail donations: [Cash (FRN's) or Blank Money Orders]
For use on envelope only.
G-Man
P.O. Box 241
Weston, Texas [75097]
Please do not make checks and Money Orders to G-man.
* * * * *
All material contained in this presentation is for educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. None of the contributors are lawyers or members of the BAR. Consult your own legal professional before attempting to make use of any of this material. There are no guarantees-implied or express-as to the accuracy or adequacy of any of the information presented.
Final Declaration of Ballot for Dallas County Judge
October 21, 2002
WARNING WARNING WARNING:
DO NOT, I SAY DO NOT USE THIS IF YOU ARE A REGISTER VOTER OR HAVE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
republic of Texas, T. R. C. P. Rule 53
Commercial state named Texas signed, and sealed
county named Dallas
Declaration of Ballot in the nature of an affidavit cast by Me, Ralph, evans, qualified Elector for the election of the County Judge for the County Court of the county named Dallas which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the 1876 Texas Constitution and Article 4, Section 10 of the 1836 constitution.
Know all other Sovereigns, and men, women, and persons, principals and commercial agents, by these presents. Hear yea, Hear yea: I, Me, Ralph Kenneth, family of Evans, cast my Ballot for Lewis Thompson Mohr for electing Lewis Thompson Mohr to the office of County Judge for the County Court of record for the people of the county named Dallas, in the land called Texas.
I, Me, addressee Ralph, evans a man, a Sovereign, Kemper v. State, 138 S. W. 1025, page 1043, the undersigned affiant,(hereinafter "Ralph"), Balloting Party, hereby declare and certify under penalty of perjury under Biblical Law recorded in James 5:12, by declaration in the nature of an affidavit that the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief, and declare the following in compliance with Article 1, Sections 1 through 29 of the 'Bill of Rights" of the 1876 Texas Constitution, and the Declaration of Rights of the 1836 constitution for a Land called Texas.
I, Me, Ralph, without any legal disabilities, am qualified for casting this Ballot for Lewis Thompson Mohr for election to the office of County Judge for the Article 5, Section 15 County Court of record for the people in the county named Dallas in the Land called Texas.
I, Me, Ralph, am a man with unalienable rights protected by the Declaration of Rights of the 1836 constitution and Article 1, "Bill of Rights" of the 1876 Texas Constitution, and preserved by Art.3 Sec. 62 of said Constitution. One of those rights is my right of casting this Ballot for Lewis Thompson Mohr for election to the office of County Judge for the Court of record for the county named Dallas.
I, Me, Ralph, declare that there is no other names of any other parties on the Ballot who are qualified for holding the office of County Judge in the county named Dallas, land of Texas.
I, Me, Ralph, declare that all other candidates have legal disabilities and are unqualified by operation of law for holding the office of County Judge.
If there are no rebuttal affidavits verified under penalty of perjury made by the commercial agents from the corporate governments, THE STATE OF TEXAS, and the county named Dallas, and the UNITED STATES, or any other party, recorded and served upon Me within ten (10) days of the recording of this Ballot, the facts asserted in this affidavit are deemed true and stand as a fact in law and Lewis Thompson Mohr is elected to the office of County Judge of the Article 5, Section 15 County Court for the People in the county named Dallas.
Declared, executed, and sealed by Me, Ralph, in recognition of title CHAPTER 37 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Sec. 37.001, on October ___, 2002, under penalty of perjury without the United States, Title 28 USC 3002(15), in recognition of Title 28 USC 1746(1), and the Texas Government Code 602.004.
Addressee, Ralph, family of Evans, a man, Qualified Elector
VERIFICATION
I, Me, Ralph, evans, have made by my hand and seal the forgoing "Declaration of ballot in the nature of a affidavit cast by a qualified Elector for the election of the county judge for the County Court of the county named Dallas which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the Texas Constitution."
Addressee, Ralph, family of Evans, a man, Qualified Elector
STATE OF TEXAS
Signed and Sealed
COUNTY OF DALLAS
On October ___, 2002, Ralph, evans, a man, in the county named Dallas, appeared before me, a notary public for the STATE OF TEXAS, and after I administered his Yea to him, he did declare that he has read the foregoing and that the foregoing is true and executed this said documented , pursuant to TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE Section 602.004.
Notary Public, STATE OF TEXAS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on October ____ , 2002, a true copy of the foregoing document "Declaration of ballot in the nature of a affidavit cast by a qualified Elector for the election of the county judge for the County Court of the county named Dallas which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the Texas Constitution was delivered to the county Clerk Records Building 509 Main Street Dallas, Texas 75202 of a county named Dallas, in the land of Texas and Clerk Dallas County Elections Department 2377 N. Stemmons Frwy. Suite 820 Dallas, Tx 75207 by first class mail and a copy to the Dallas County Commissioners by electronic mail.
by me addressee:
All must be Exact: Notary public Donald Evans C/O 3352 Broadway Blvd # 406 Garland, Texas [75043]
Abstract of Judgment
November 14, 2002
ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT by
Declaration in the nature of an affidavit
republic of Texas, T. R. C. P. Rule 53
Commercial state of Texas
county of Dallas
signed, and sealed
NON-NEGOTIABLE DECLARATION Of ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT in the nature of an AFFIDAVIT
Pursuant to and under original jurisdiction by law the law of the land of Texas.
I, me, (NAME) on the land of the county of Dallas within the land of Texas, do herein declare that this is a true and correct Abstract of the Judgment rendered on the recorded instrument (Recorded Declaration Number) in the county of Dallas records on (Date), in favor of (Name), holder in due course in Judgment.
vs.
Debtor's Name
Location:
Debtor(s) in Judgment,
For the sum certain of (amount) united States dollars silver specie coin, with penalty from date of Judgment at the rate of ten (10) percent penalty to be added to the total amount and ten (10) percent penalty to be added each/every thirty days and all cost of controversy as of record is manifest from date of this order until paid.
Amount of Credits none Known.
There is still now due on said judgment
The sum certain of Amount) united States dollars silver specie coin with penalty from as stated above at the rate of as stated above until paid.
Debtor's address is shown in the original bill; if not shown, the nature of notice and the date and place notice was served is:
Holder in due course of said judgment XXXXXXXXXXXX against Debtor(s)_____________
By me, holder in due course.
Name
VERIFICATION
State of Texas
county of Dallas
Signed and Sealed
This Verified Abstract of Judgment and its content was acknowledged, before me, by (Name) pursuant to and under original jurisdiction by the due course of the law of the land of Texas a Notary Public by (name) in and for the State of Texas, on this XXXXXXX day of the month of XXXXXXXXXX, A.D. 2002.
Seal:
Notary Public
Copyright Procedure
November 14, 2002
Copyright Procedure:
It goes like this,
1. They use your copyright.
2. You send them a bill per the copyright contract agreement.
3. They don't pay and ignore you.
4. You do an affidavit of non-payment attach a copy of the bill you sent them.
5. Take the affidavit with the Bill attached and record it in the county records (Send them a copy of the recorded affidavit)
6. If they still ignore you and fail to pay. You then do a abstract on the judgment which is the uncontested affidavit that you recorded and sent to them. The affidavit of fact of non-payment is the judgment therefore all that is left is the abstract.
7. No fact in dispute no court required.
You gave notice time and grace and due process. Judgment is entered and the judgment has been abstracted. Now you are the holder of title to the debt by judgment and the judgment has been abstracted; they are now the debtors. You can now either sell the judgment or do a writ of attachment on their property and sell the property to pay off the debt owed to you. That is what they have been doing to you.
The part we have been missing is the abstract of the judgment.
Bill - Due and Owing
November 23, 2002
Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for non-payment of Bill due and owing by (Names)
In the matters of commerce, all commerce operates in truth. Demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure.
Republic and one of the
Commercial State of Texas ss
in the county of Dallas
To: PARTIES USERS AND ISSUERS (herein after Respondents)
In the Matter of the use of copyright of (First) (Last) for Respondents self-enrichment.
I, me, addressee (First) , family of (Last) , the undersigned, Sovereign, natural born living soul, the Posterity, born upon the land in the one of several counties within the one of the several States united of America, the undersigned Posterity, Creditor, Claimant, and Secured Party, hereinafter 'Secured Party', do hereby solemnly declare, say, and state:
1. I, me, the Secured Party is competent to state the matters set forth herewith.
2. I, me, the Secured Party has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
3. All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if testifying I, me, the Secured Party shall so state.
Plain Statement of Facts
A matter must be expressed to be resolved.
In commerce truth is sovereign.
Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit.
An unrebutted Affidavit stands as Truth in commerce.
An unrebutted Affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce.
An Affidavit for Truth, under commercial law, can only be satisfied: by a rebuttal Affidavit for truth, by payment, by agreement, by resolution, by a jury according to the rules of Common Law.
I, me, Secured Party am expressing truth by this Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for non-payment of Bill due and owing by (Names) presented by me, addressee, (First) , family of (Last) , living soul, the Secured Party, one of We the People under Original Jurisdiction law of the land of Texas.
WHEREAS, the public record is the highest form of evidence, I, me, Secured Party, am hereby timely creating public record by Declaration with this Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for Truth in Commerce and Contract for Waiver of Tort Presented by me, addressee, (First) (Last), living soul, the Secured Party, one of We the People under Original Law Jurisdiction of the Texas and United States Contracts, the Constitutions.
1. Fact: On or about (day month year) use my copyright my private intellectual property for their own self-enrichment.
2. Fact: On or about (day month year) I sent to Respondents the Bill per our contract/agreement for use of my copyright my private intellectual property.
3. Fact: The Respondents have failed to pay the Bill due me for use of my private property as agreed.
4. Fact: The Respondent's Bill owed to me is past due for use of my private property
5. Fact: The Respondents have ten (10) to pay the attached bill in the amount of the sum certain (XXXX) United State dollars in silver specie plus ten (10) percent penalty. Respondents Failure to pay the Bill plus penalty due me within ten (10) will cause judgment to be recorded against Respondent. The Respondents will be responsibility for all cost and fees.
I, me, the Secured Party, am not an expert in the Law, however I do know right from wrong. I hereby and herein reserve the right to amend and make amendment to this document as necessary in order that the truth may be ascertained and proceeding justly determined. If any living soul has information that will controvert and overcome this Declaration, since this is a commercial matter, please advise me within ten (10) days. Your silence stands as tacit approval of, the factual declarations here being established as fact as a matter of law and this affidavit by Declaration will stand as final judgment in this matter; and for the sum certain herein stated and will be in full force and effect against Respondents due and payable and enforceable by law.
The Undersigned, I, me, the Secured Party, holder in due course of original do herewith declare, state and say that I, Secured Party, issue this with sincere intent in truth, that I, me, the undersigned Secured Party, am competent to state the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, and reasonable and just to the best of my knowledge by me undersigned addressee.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for non-payment of Bill due and owing by ( Their Name(s) ) in support of judgment and abstract.
I, me, explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
I, me, explicitly reserve all of my unalienable Rights without prejudice under Texas Rules of civil Procedure 815.
I, me, explicitly reserve all of my unalienable Rights without prejudice.
With full reservation of all my natural God given substantive rights without prejudice under the State Constitutions Executed pursuant to TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE Section 602.004 this __ day of the month of ______ in the year of two-thousand-two; A.D.
By me, addressee (First) (Last),
living soul, holder in due course, the Secured Party.
Mailing location exact: Address, post office for the united, City, Texas 75000
Private Mark: ______________________
Addressee: (First), family of (Last)
Notice
The use of a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion, nor does it alter my status in any manner. The purpose of notary is for verification and identification only.
State of Texas
County of Collin
This instrument was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, by (First) (Last) this ________ day of the month of ______________, in the year of two-thousand-two; A.D.
Name:
Seal:
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
Anti-Bribery Statement
Recorded November 6, 2002
republic of Texas, T. R. C. P. Rule 53
Commercial state named Texas
county named Dallas
signed, and sealed
Declaration of Anti-Bribery Statement required before taking the Oath of Office for the office of County Judge in the nature of an affidavit by Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, qualified Elector, and County Judge elect for the county named Dallas for the County Court which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the 1876 Texas Constitution and Article 4, Section 10 of the 1836 constitution.
Know all other Sovereigns, and men, women, and persons, principals and commercial agents, by these presents. Hear yea, Hear yea:
I, Me, addressee, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, a Sovereign, Kemper v. State, 138 S. W. 1025, page 1043, the undersigned Declarant, (hereinafter Lewis), County Judge elect, hereby declare and certify under penalty of perjury under Biblical Law recorded in James 5:12, by declaration in the nature of an affidavit that the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief, and declare the following in compliance with Article 1, Sections 1 through 29 of the 'Bill of Rights' of the 1876 Texas Constitution, and the Declaration of Rights of the 1836 constitution for a Land called Texas.
I, Me, Lewis, without any legal disabilities, am qualified for ascending to, and entering upon the duties of, the office of County Judge for the Article 5, Section 15 County Court of record for the people in the county named Dallas in the Land called Texas.
I, Me, Lewis, Declare that as required in the 1876 Texas Constitution at Article 16, Section 1(b) Each member of the Legislature and all other elected officers, before taking the Oath or Affirmation of office prescribed by this section and entering upon the duties of office, shall subscribe to the following statement:
I, Lewis Thompson Mohr, do solemnly affirm and Declare that I have not directly nor indirectly paid, offered, promised to pay, contributed, or promised to contribute any money or thing of value, or promised any public office or employment for the giving or withholding of a vote at the election at which I was elected so help me God.
I, Me, Lewis, Declare that I do so solemnly subscribe. Further Declarant Sayeth Naught.
________________________________________________
Addressee, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, Declarant
VERIFICATION
I, Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, have made by my hand and seal the forgoing Declaration of Anti-Bribery Statement required before taking the Oath of Office for the office of County Judge in the nature of an affidavit by Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, qualified Elector, and County Judge elect for the county named Dallas for the County Court which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the1876 Texas Constitution and Article 4, Section 10 of the 1836 constitution.
________________________________________________
Addressee, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, Declarant
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
Signed and Sealed
On November ___, 2002, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, in the county named Dallas, appeared before me, a notary public for the STATE OF TEXAS, and after I administered his Yea to him, he did declare that he has read the foregoing and that the foregoing is true and executed this said documented, pursuant to TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE Section 602.004.
___________________________
Notary Public, STATE OF TEXAS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on November ____ , 2002, a true copy of the foregoing document 'Declaration of Anti-Bribery Statement required before taking the Oath of Office for the office of County Judge in the nature of an affidavit by Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, qualified Elector, and County Judge elect for the county named Dallas for the County Court which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the1876 Texas Constitution and Article 4, Section 10 of the 1836 constitution.' was delivered to the recorder of the county, in care of county Clerk of the county Court located in the Records Building, 509 Main Street, Dallas, Texas, [75202 Copyright], in a county named Dallas, in the land of Texas and Clerk, and by first class mail a copy to the Dallas County Commissioners and the Secretary of State.
By Me, addressee: _____________________
All rebuttal affidavits must be Exact: Lewis Mohr, C/o Notary Public Donald Evans, 3352 Broadway Blvd # 406, Garland, Texas, [75043 Copyright].
Oath of Office
Dallas County Judge
Recorded November 25, 2002
republic of Texas, T. R. C. P. Rule 53
Commercial state named Texas
county named Dallas
signed, and sealed
Declaration of Official Oath of Office required before entering upon the duties of the office of County Judge in the nature of an affidavit by Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, qualified Elector, and County Judge elect for the county named Dallas for the County Court which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the 1876 Texas Constitution and Article 4, Section 10 of the 1836 constitution.
"Know all other Sovereigns, and men, women, and persons, principals and commercial agents, by these presents. Hear yea, Hear yea:
"I, Me, addressee, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, a Sovereign, Kemper v. State, 138 S. W. 1025, page 1043, the undersigned Declarant, (hereinafter "Lewis"), County Judge elect, hereby declare and certify under penalty of perjury under Biblical Law recorded in James 5:12, by declaration in the nature of an affidavit that the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief, and declare the following in compliance with Article 1, Sections 1 through 29 of the 'Bill of Rights" of the 1876 Texas Constitution, and the Declaration of Rights of the 1836 constitution for a Land called Texas.
"I, Me, Lewis, without any legal disabilities, am qualified for ascending to, and entering upon the duties of, the office of County Judge for the Article 5, Section 15 County Court of record for the people in the county named Dallas in the Land called Texas.
"I, Me, Lewis, Declare that as required in the 1836 constitution for the republic of Texas at Article 5, Section 3, and the 1876 Texas Constitution at Article 16, Section 1(a) 'Members of the Legislature, and all other elected officers, before they enter upon the duties of their offices, shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:'
'I, Lewis Thompson Mohr, do solemnly affirm and Declare that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of County Judge in the county named Dallas, in the Land named Texas, and of the State of Texas, and I will to the best of My ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitutions and the laws of the United States, and of this State, and of this republic, so help Me God.'
"I, Me, Lewis, Declare that I do so solemnly affirm and Declare. Further Declarant Sayeth Naught."
________________________________________________
Addressee, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, Declarant
VERIFICATION
I, Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, have made by my hand and seal the forgoing "Declaration of Anti-Bribery Statement required before taking the Oath of Office for the office of County Judge in the nature of an affidavit by Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, qualified Elector, and County Judge elect for the county named Dallas for the County Court which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the1876 Texas Constitution and Article 4, Section 10 of the 1836 constitution.
________________________________________________
Addressee, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, Declarant
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
Signed and Sealed
On November ___, 2002, Lewis Thompson Mohr, a man, in the county named Dallas, appeared before me, a notary public for the STATE OF TEXAS, and after I administered his Yea to him, he did declare that he has read the foregoing and that the foregoing is true and executed this said documented, pursuant to TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE Section 602.004.
___________________________
Notary Public, STATE OF TEXAS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on November ____ , 2002, a true copy of the foregoing document "Declaration of Anti-Bribery Statement required before taking the Oath of Office for the office of County Judge in the nature of an affidavit by Me, Lewis Thompson Mohr, qualified Elector, and County Judge elect for the county named Dallas for the County Court which shall be a court of record as mandated by Article 5 Section 15 of the 1876 Texas Constitution and Article 4, Section 10 of the 1836 constitution." was delivered to the recorder of the county, in care of county Clerk of the county Court located in the Records Building, 509 Main Street, Dallas, Texas, [75202(c)], in a county named Dallas, in the land of Texas and Clerk, Dallas County Elections Department, 2377 N. Stemmons Freeway, Suite 820, Dallas, Texas [75207(c)] by first class mail and a copy to the Dallas County Commissioners and the Secretary of State by First class mail.
By Me, addressee: _____________________
All rebuttal affidavits must be Exact: Lewis Mohr, C/o Notary Public Donald Evans, 3352 Broadway Blvd # 406, Garland, Texas, [75043(c)].
Independence
Recorded November 25, 2002
Declaration of Independence by me for me known as Ralph Kenneth Evans per the recorded census records of the several (u)nited States of America
I, Ralph Kenneth Evans (and all derivates thereof), upon the land within the borders of a nation known as Texas am a Citizen/sovereign as a result of the actions of my creator the Great Sovereign my Lord the Great I AM and passed to me, His child, by Birthright and the blood of this Son. I make known to all, on, above and below the world in the name of my Lord the Almighty Creator by this my Declaration of Independence.
I, solemnly declare, state, say and publish for all to know and take notice of my divine right to expatriate absolute, my res in trust to the foreign jurisdiction known as the municipal corporations of the District of Columbia, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE STATE THE UNITED STATES and all subsidiaries and all democracies, revoke and rescind any implied grant to any and all of its public or private functionaries, officers employees, agents and assigns and hereby return to the Republic. Any and all past and present political ties implied by operation of law or otherwise in trust with the democracies is hereby revoked and dissolved.
I have rejected and/or waived all benefits of the said trust, and I deny, waive and/or reject any status as beneficiary to the trust in any capacity.
Further, I deny being a "Donator" to the trust, and hereby reclaim any Property which may have been assumed or presumed to have been donated to the trust by me.
I cannot/will not be held liable for compelled benefits.
I Declare that I have full power to contract and establish commerce as guaranteed by the Declaration of Rights in the original organic Republic of Texas Constitution of 1836, Articles One Through Twenty-Nine, known as the "Bill of Rights", of the CONSTITUTION OF STATE OF TEXAS of 1876, the first Ten Amendments, known as the "Bill of Rights", to the Constitution of the [u]nited States of America, a Republic.
Notice has been given to all, use of any of my private property including but not limited to all my copyrights will be by contract per the terms and condition as recorded in the public records in the county of Dallas upon the land of Texas.
I Claim all Rights listed, inferred or referred to hereinabove as my Unalienable Right as a sovereign. Strictly speaking, in our republican forms of government, the absolute sovereignty of the nation is in the people of the nation; (q. v.) and the residuary sovereignty of each state, not granted to any of its public functionaries, is in the people of the state. (q. v.) 2 Dall. 471; and vide, generally, 2 Dall. 433, 455; 3 Dall. 93; 1 Story, Const. Section 208; 1 Toull. n. 20 Merl. Reper. h. t.
By this Declaration be it known to all that all grants have been revoke rescinded and reclaimed by me for breach of faith, contract, duty, and for fraud, theft, deceptive trade practices, criminal conversion and a enormous number of other unconscionable criminals acts and deeds.
It is further declared that a return on equity is demanded of all private and public corporation their officers, employees and assigns failure for return when notice will cause a penalty of one hundred thousand united States of America dollars of silver specie to be assessed and will be due for payment upon assessment date no grace period will be given. You have had your grace now you must pay your debt that is past due.
This Declaration of Independence is hereby executed pursuant to the law of the land of Texas this 25th day of November, 2002, 'nunc pro tunc' for December 13, 1938.
By addressee,
Ralph Kenneth Evans sovereign upon the land of Texas
Notice
The use of a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion, nor does it alter my status in any manner. The purpose of notary is for recording, verification and identification only.
Commercial State of Texas
County of Dallas
This instrument was acknowledged by declaration before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, by Ralph Kenneth Evans this 25th day of the month of November, in the year of two-thousand-two; A.D.
Name: Seal:
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
Notice
The county court of record is open
December 12, 2002
Notice of the Court being open for all business of the People
In Texas there are three Departments of Government, the Executive, the Legislative and the Judicial. Then there is the Government for the People. The Executive, department reports to the People, the Legislative department reports to the People and the judicial department reports to the People.
The people did write a contract that established their Government and the departments of their Government. It is a contract called a Constitution. In that contract was a clause called the 'Bill of Rights'. The 'Bill of Rights' was forever inviolate, period. Also in that contract the People wrote in a clause that created a Court of record in each county ('district'). It is the supreme Court for enforcement and for preserving the rights of the people which are to remain inviolate forever. That supreme Court has jurisdiction for determining any question brought before it by one of the People by law and by fact. All rulings, orders and decrees by the supreme Court of record of the People are not open for question by any other court. Any attempt to bring one of the People of Texas before any other court for any reason, by any party, is an act of sedition against that contract (Constitution).
This is a true statement of fact and if called to testify before a Court of competent jurisdiction I will so state under the penalty of perjury, Ralph Kenneth of the family of Evans and the Lord Jesus the Christ a qualified Justice of the supreme Court of record.
Hear ye Hear ye Hear Ye
Come January next, 2003, upon the second day, the supreme Court of record of the People, located at the county seat in the city of Dallas, county of Dallas, upon the land in a country named Texas, will again be open for business for the People. Chief Justice, Lewis Thompson family of Mohr, lawfully elected by ballot of the qualified electors in the county of Dallas, upon the land within Texas, will be the presiding judge of the supreme Court of record in the county of Dallas for the people within the land known as Texas.
Come one, come all living souls. Your grievances will be heard.
Bond to discharge attachment for debt
December 15, 2002
I, (Your Name) , principal, as surety, is held and bound to pay (Example THE STATE OF GEORGIA) the sum of_________ dollars, unless the said (Example Defendant YOUR NAME) shall satisfy any judgment which may be recovered against him by the said (Example Plaintiff, THE STATE OF GEORGIA) in his attachment suit against the said (Example Defendant YOUR NAME) for _____.__ dollars, returnable before the circuit court of__________ County, (State) on the 00th day of (Month) A. D. 200X.
By me, (Your Name) , a man holder in due course, principal.
Below not part of Document. Reference material only proving validity!
MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972 As Amended
SEC. 11-33-65. Form of bond to discharge attachment for debt not due.
The bond to discharge attachment for a debt not due may be in the following form, viz.:
"We, ---- principal, and ---- and ----, sureties, are held and bound to pay ---- the sum of ---- dollars, unless ---- shall well and truly pay ---- the sum demanded by him as plaintiff is his attachment suit for a debt not due, the sum of ----, dollars, on or before the ---- day of ----, A. D. ----, and pay the costs of said suit, which is pending in the circuit court of ---- County, Mississippi. This the ---- day of ----, A. D.----."
"________________"
"________________"
"________________"
SOURCES: Codes, 1892, Sec. 157; 1906, Sec. 161; Hemingway's 1917, Sec. 153; 1930, Sec. 151; 1942, Sec. 2707.
MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972 As Amended
SEC. 11-33-61. Form of bond to discharge attachment for debt due.
The bond to discharge the attachment for a debt due may be in the following form, viz.:
"We, ---- principal, and ---- and ----, as sureties, are held and bound to pay ---- the sum of ---- dollars, unless the said ---- shall satisfy any judgment which may be recovered against him by the said ---- in his attachment suit against the said ---- for ---- dollars, returnable before the circuit court of ---- County, on the ---- day of ---- A. D. ----."
SOURCES: Codes, 1880, Sec. 2478; 1892, Sec. 155; 1906, Sec. 159; Hemingway's 1917, Sec. 151; 1930, Sec. 149; 1942, Sec. 2705.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
December 15, 2002
In the Matter of Claim number 3-02-CV-1918-C
In the matters of commerce, all commerce operates in truth. Demand for truth is made of all parties and for full disclosure.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
I am in receipt of your 'MEMORANDUM ORDER' your 'MEMORANDUM ORDER' is confusing, vague and ambiguous therefore I am demanding clarification and full disclosure. Who are you? Who is your employer? Are you a commercial agent? Are you attempting to use your office to force me to issue you credit of the people of the united States of America for yourselves and your benefactor's own self enrichment? Who is the Beneficiary? Full disclosure is demanded by me of you.
And is it your intent: for issuing MEMORANDUM for/and a formal word with which the body of a record in the Court of the Kings Bench and functions only as evidence of the contract and need not contain every term, so that a letter may be a sufficient 'memorandum' to take a case out of the statute of frauds? Full disclosure is demanded by me of you.
The MEMORANDUM must be such as to disclose the parties, the nature and substance of the contract the consideration and promise and be signed by the party to be bound or his authorized agent. Who is the Party?. Full disclosure is demanded by me of you.
ORDER: In Commercial law, a designation of the person to whom a bill of exchange or negotiable promissory note is to be paid. Was this your intent? If not I demand you state your intent.
In the heading and style it states UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in line one of 'MEMORANDUM ORDER' it states Petitioner United States of America: is this the several states united of America or is it the bankrupt corporation as UNITED STATES OF AMERICA with the same name? Demand is made of you to produce to me a signed copy of petition. Full disclosure is demanded by me of you.
has filed a petition to enforce an Internal Revenue Service summons: Who's Internal Revenue? Was the summons for me Ricardo Elian or was the Fiction, Actor a.k.a, RICARDO ELIAN. If it was for me when, who's and which Court was I summoned to appear? Full disclosure is demanded by me of you.
Service summons served on Respondent Ricardo Elian: Are you claiming that I Ricardo Elian am my private copyrighted property known as the actor named RICAEDO ELIAN which has been removed from commerce by me? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
For the reasons stated herein, the petition: Was the petition made to the Magistrate of the Kings bench by Kevin R. Rogue using the Kings Esquire Assistant (Clerk) Attorney Frank Able? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
is granted.:. I ask you Jeff Kaplan to produce the title or your authority for the gift by your grant of my private copyright intellectual property to anyone ever who it may be? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
I
On March 13,2002, the IRS served a summons on respondent: in the style and heading it is states that 'RICARDO ELIAN Respondent' in the first part of your 'MEMORANDUM ORDER' it states 'Respondent Ricardo Elian' I am confused who is the respondent? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
as part of an investigation into his income tax liability for the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000. Income Tax. Tax levied by the U.S. Government, and by some state governments, on an individual, corporation, or other taxable units income. Are each of or all of you Jeff Kaplan, Kevin R. Rogue and Frank Able claiming that I a living soul, a man Ricardo Elian am any of the forgoing taxable units? I am not asking about the unit named by you as RICARDO ELIAN just me. Are you acting of behalf of the U.S. Government in this matter or are you acting for some other Government, if so name that Government if not then so state? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
Respondent was directed to appear before Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque and produce certain books, records, papers, and data on March 28, 2002 at 9:00 am. Certain.. Ascertained; precise; identified; settled; exact; definitive; clearly known; unambiguous; In the event the 'Revenue Officer R. Rogue' has failed to include in the petition the list certain of the books, records, papers, and data then 'Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque' has committed fraud and is in violation of public policy. I demand 'Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque' produce a list certain and name the party he requires to produce the list attached to 'Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque' delegation of authority issue him by every what Government he claims to be a Revenue Officer. Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure. Demand is made of 'Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque' to produce the list certain within three (3) days.
Respondent failed to appear as required. Which Respondent? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
The government filed this action to enforce the summons on September 5,2002. Which Government and whos Government? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
A show cause hearing was scheduled for October 17, 2002 at 8:30 am. Respondent was personally served with. a copy of the show cause order on October 2,2002, Again I ask which Respondent whom are you speaking was the order for the Actor RICARDO ELIAN my private copyrighted property or me the man a living soul Ricardo Elian? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
but failed to appear at the hearing. Assistant United States Attorney Frank Able appeared, for the government and: Again whos and which Government? Is the party and the Government 'Assistant United States Attorney Frank Able appeared' for the British Crown? If not state the Government in certain terms that Assistant United States Attorney Frank Able appeared, did appear? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
( Foot note: 1 Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque attempted to personally serve respondent with the summons on March 13, 2002. When no one answered the door, Roque attached the summons to the front door of the respondent's residence at 4141 Horizon North Parkway, #825 Dallas, Texas.) End page 1
announced ready to proceed. After considering the evidence and the written submissions of the parties, 2 the court determines that the summons should be enforced: Again who are all the parties state for certain and whom has been ordered by said summons and summoned to do what? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
II
A federal district courting enforce an IRS summons if the respondent fails to appear and produce records that are relevant to a legitimate tax inquiry. 28 U.S.C. Section 7604. United States v. Wyatt, 637 F.2d 293. 299-300 (5th Cn-. 1981):
Are you Jeff Kaplan, Kevin R. Rogue and Frank Able claiming this matter is a legitimate tax inquiry or are you using fraudulent commercial paper and fraudulent commercial process and deceptive trade practice with the intent to entice me to issue you and your principal credit of the people of the several States united in America for your own self enrichment? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
The government must prove that: (1) the investigation is being conducted for a legitimate purpose; (2) the summons is relevant to that purpose; (3) the information sought is not already in the possession of the IRS; and (4) all prefer administrative procedures have been followed. United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58, 85 S.Ct. 248, 254-55, 13 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964); Barquero v. United States, 18 F.3d 1311. 1316 (5th Cir. 1994). The burden shifts to the taxpayer to challenge the summons on any "appropriate ground." Powell, 85 S.Ct. at 255: Barquero, 18 F.3d at 1316-17. These grounds are limited to cases involving harassment, abuse of process, and other acts of bad faith. See United States v. Stuart. 489 U.S. 353, 360, 109 S.Ct. 1183, 1188, 103 L.Ed.2d 388 (1989): Again I demand to know whos and which Government? (1) I, Demand to know is this matter being conducted for a legitimate purpose or is it to take credit of the people of the several United States of America for your own and your principal self enrichment? (2) Again I ask who is the summon for state for certain with full disclosure? (3) Again I demand to know for certain what information? (4) I demand strict proof for certain that all prefer administrative procedures have been followed. Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque testified at the hearing. He said that respondent has not filed any tax returns for the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000. Again demand is made to disclose to me who Kevin R. Rogue is a revenue officer for, which Respondent that 'Officer Kelvin R. Roque testified' about at the hearing? . Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure
According to Roque, the financial information requested in the summons is necessary to determine the amount of respondent's tax liability for those years. What certain financial information was requested and from whom? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
Roque farther testified that the IRS has followed all
(Foot note 2 Respondent submitted various documents prior to the show cause hearing which the court will liberally construe as a response to the petition. It appears that respondent objects to paying taxes and producing his tax records to the IRS because he is a citizen of the Republic of Texas. Of course, the Republic of Texas ceased to exist when Texas became the 28th state of the United States of America in 1845. See McLaren v. United Stated Incorporated, 2 F. Supp.2d 48, 51 (D.D.C. 1998), citing Texas v. White, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.), 700, 19 L.Ed. 227 (1868.)Accordingly, respondent's objection is overruled as frivolous.) FOOT NOTES WILL BE DEALT WITH SEPARATELY.
applicable statutes and administrative procedures: Demand is made of 'Roque' to produce 'the IRS all applicable statutes and administrative procedures that he 'Roque' has followed? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
and that there is no Justice Department referral in effect with respect to this matter. If 'there is no Justice Department referral in effect with respect to this matter' then what is this matter about is it about a foreign power and agents of a foreign power attempting to use the Court to entice me to issue credit of the people of the several States united to a foreign power? Is that foreign power the British Crown also known as the Queen of England? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
The court finds that the IRS summons is valid and should be enforced. From what Government was the summons issued by as admitted there is no Justice Department referral? Is it from a foreign Government if so state the name of all the Governments involved in this matter? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
The government has established the investigation is being conducted for a legitimate purpose, the summons is relevant to that purpose, the information sought is not already in the possession of the IRS and the proper administrative procedures haw been followed. Respondent has failed to demonstrate bad faith or an abuse of process on the part of the government. Again I demand to know which and all the Governments by name and whom is being summons and what information for certain, what administrative procedures and who does the procedures apply by name and is not fraudulent commercial papers, fraudulent commercial process and deceptive bad faith? Whos Government and whos administrative procedures? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
CONCLUSION
For these reasons, the petition to enforce the IRS summons is granted. Do you Jeff Kaplan have the authority to grant this gift if so I demand you produce to me? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
Respondent Ricardo Elian is ordered to testify and produce all books, records, papers, and other documents specified in the summons attached as Exhibit "A" to the governments petition filed on September 5,2002. The order attached to the petition is confusing, vague and ambiguous and not certain. I demand certain your authority and whos Governments by all names? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
Respondent is ordered to appear with these materials before Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque, or any other officer of the Internal Revenue Service, I demand to have a copy of 'Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque, or any other officer of the Internal Revenue Service,' of the delegation of authority be produce to me within three (3) days to substantiate the said order and supply me a copy of all contracts and titles? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
at 1100 Commerce Street, Room 9B20, Dallas, Texas 75342, on November 8, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. Has this land been ceded to the several united States of America or is it a commercial location where 'Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque, and other officer of the Internal Revenue Service,' are conducting business for a foreign powers, Governments and committing act of sedition against the laws of the land known as Texas and it organic Constitution.
A copy of this order shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by regular mail to Ricardo Elian, 4141 Horizon North Partway, #825, Dallas, Texas 75287. Your order is accepted and returned. Now demand is made for closure by me of this matter contingent upon and after full disclosure.
SO ORDERED. Accepted and returned contingent upon and after full disclosure.
DATED: October 17, 2002.
JEFF KAPLAN
UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE which UNITED STATES is it the corporation that is Bankrupt and what government are you magistrate judge is it the Crown of England if not disclose the name to me for certain? Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
( Foot note: 1 Revenue Officer Kelvin R. Roque attempted to personally serve respondent with the summons on March 13, 2002. When no one answered the door, Roque attached the summons to the front door of the respondents residence at 4141 Horizon North Parkway, #825 Dallas, Texas.) Demand is made for strict proof of the Courts proper venue and the courts jurisdiction and in view of the omission of the Christian name by either plaintiff or defendant in a legal process prevents the court from acquiring jurisdiction, there being no other description or identification or appearance or waiver of process. -- Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 8th Edition. See: Boyington vs. Chamberlain, 38 Texas 604; Thompson vs. McCorkle, 136 Indiana 484 NE Reporter 813. Demand is made by me of you for full disclosure.
And now we come to the matter of my political right and my rights of the country I chose for the privilege of Citizenship.
(Foot note 2: Respondent submitted various documents prior to the show cause hearing which the court will liberally construe as a response to the petition. It appears that respondent objects to paying taxes and producing his tax records to the IRS because he is a citizen of the Republic of Texas. Of course, the Republic of Texas ceased to exist when Texas became the 28th state of the United States of America in 1845. See McLaren v. United Stated Incorporated, 2 F. Supp.2d 48, 51 (D.D.C. 1998), citing Texas v. White, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.), 700, 19 L.Ed. 227 (1868.)Accordingly, respondents objection is overruled as frivolous.) Now supposedly Jeff Kaplan UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (at this point I am not sure who he is and on whos behalf he is acting) has brought up the issue of the State of Texas as being a State of the United States of America in 1845. my answer is as follows:
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
COMMERCIAL FRAUD COMMERCIAL FRAUD
See: Affidavit of Truth attached as, Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit of Truth in Commerce Presented by me, Ricardo Elian, living soul, one of We the People upon the land known as Texas as required by laws of the Republic pursuant to T.R.C.P. 53.
Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit of Truth in Commerce Presented by me, Ricardo Elian, living soul, one of We the People upon the land known as Texas as required by laws of the Republic pursuant to T.R.C.P. 53..
Commerce operates in truth. Demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure.
To: All parties in the matter of Claim number 3-02-CV-1918-G, I, Ricardo Elian, declare.
I, me the undersigned one of We, the People, Sovereigns, living souls, the posterity, I, me the
undersigned Posterity, Creditor, Claimant, and Secured Party, hereinafter Secured Party, or I, or myself, or me, or addressee Ricardo Elian does hereby solemnly declare, say, and state:
a. I, me, the Secured Party competent to state the matters set forth herewith.
b. Secured Party has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
c. All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if testifying I, me, the Secured Party shall so state.
Plain Statement of Facts by declaration.
A matter must be expressed to be resolved. In commerce truth is sovereign. Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. An unrebutted Affidavit stands as Truth in commerce. An unrebutted Affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce. An Affidavit of Truth, under commercial law, can only be satisfied:
by a rebuttal Affidavit of truth, by payment, by agreement, by resolution by a jury according to the rules of Common Law.
.
This affidavit of truth of material facts pertaining to me, Ricardo Elian and my rights, establishes my relationship with all parties in the matter of claim number 3-02-CV-1918-G. This affidavit of truth of material facts is intended to comply with the law of the land of Texas and the united States in America in accord with your Title 28 Section and the "good faith and reasonable cause standard of the of Rule 601 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. I have personal knowledge of facts set forth herein and your (Rule 43(e), F.R.Civ.P. & Rule 602, F.R.Evid.). Declarations by affidavit of truth of material facts are as follows:
Fact: There being no authenticated law (Constitution) in the archives of Texas that lawfully changed Texas from a Republic to a state of the United States.
Fact: The actors that claim to be acting in the name of the State of Texas or THE STATE OF TEXAS are acting in fraud and are fraud artist, outlaws and criminals.
Fact: All their acts are acts of fraud, criminal and outlaw without even the privileges of citizenship.
Fact: All the ones that aid and abet these outlaws are also outlaws and without the privileges of citizenship making themselves foreign agents.
Fact: There is no Political Question for debate as some may claim. There is only the matter of law and there are no privileges of citizenship or immunity for violation of the law the constitution of the Republic of Texas.
Fact: The Governor, The Legislators and The Courts of The State of Texas are all a fraud.
Fact: There is no authority by law for the Nation of Texas to be a State of the United States.
Fact: Quote "The framers drew heavily from the Constitution of the United States and those of several of its states, but in one respect there was a basic difference in that there was to be only one state, rather than a federal system, in the Republic of Texas" from the 1836 Republic of Texas Constitution.
Fact: Quote: "and shall swear to support this constitution, and that he will bear true allegiance to the republic of Texas, shall be entitled to all the privileges of citizenship' from the 1836 Republic of Texas Constitution.
Fact: Therefore those that claimed to have changed the Republic of Texas to a state of the United States failed to bear true allegiance to the republic of Texas, and lost all their privileges of citizenship.
Fact: They being non-citizens were unable to change the Republic of Texas to a state of the United States by authority of law.
Fact: The Supreme Court of the State of Texas has ruled for Want of Jurisdiction in Case No. 95-1002 November 16, 1995; STATE OF TEXAS vs. Republic of Texas. The STATE OF TEXAS SUPREME COURT is a Corporate entity and can only rule on corporate issues.
Fact: In addition, the Court of The Hague of The Peace Palace / The Netherlands on December 18, 1995 Cause 94135, Republic of Texas ex rel the People of the Republic of Texas v. united states of America ex rel operating under War Powers: ruled there is 'Want of Jurisdiction' and expounded the sovereign issue and The Hague cannot rule on sovereign issues, only on corporate issues between corporate states.
Fact: CORPORATIONS, FICTIONS, FRANCHISES are mere pieces of paper named by men and have no souls and cannot speak, thereby can only be Represented by Third Parties, who are themselves CORPORATIONS, FICTIONS, FRANCHISES, working or being part of and partial to the same and cannot testify for themselves or the CORPORATIONS, FICTIONS, FRANCHISES.
Fact: Only a Sovereign can Declare and Demand and alter their form of government at any time they so choose. This comes in various forms such as Affidavits, Declarations where only a Sovereign can declare under the penalty of perjury.
Fact: The State of Texas is the De facto government, the Democracy or Corporate form of government, of THE STATE OF TEXAS that is a subsidiary of the Corporate UNITED STATES and any citizen of these corporations are subject to the rules, codes, regulations, statutes and administration procedures for the corporation. Citizens are subject to the government they choose to live under; Texians are Sovereign and are obligated to no government, only to his/her fellow man/woman, to treat them, as they would like to be treated.
Fact: Instead of keeping the peace among We the People for Texas, you now are enforcing commercial papers delegated by third party corporate decisions from courts of LAW MERCHANTS for Third Party Debt Collectors.
Fact: We the Texian people of the Republic of Texas that have so claimed and being sovereign, are not subject to or controlled by a democracy or popular vote.
Fact: A republic is one of we the people altering or declaring their right to a free existence within the framework of the common law and to respect the rights of others to do the same. We the people under the inherited common law, passed on to us by our creator of Heaven and Earth and those common laws are (a) We do not harm another human being. (b) We do not harm another's property (c) We do not lie (d) Our word is our bond.
Fact: A democracy is a corporate form of government where 51% can dictate their ways of life to the 49% while treating everyone as a piece of property in commerce.
Fact: You each of you Jeff Kaplan Kelvin R. Roque and Frank Able are demanded to immediately produce all Legal Documents of the Annexation for the Republic of Texas and all authorizing documents thereof. For support of your foot notes and being a part of your 'MEMORANDUM ORDER' 'the Republic of Texas ceased to exist when Texas became the 28th state of the United States of America in 1845. See McLaren v. United Stated Incorporated, 2 F. Supp.2d 48, 51 (D.D.C. 1998), citing Texas v. White, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.), 700, 19 L.Ed. 227 (1868.)Accordingly, respondent's objection is overruled as frivolous.)'
Fact: Failing to produce the above evidence means you have no jurisdiction or venue to neither serve commercial papers on a Texian nor enforce a commercial court's ruling on a Texian. This includes Kelvin R. Roque and Frank Able acting as third party debt collectors.
Fact: The Republic of Texas common law courts is able, can and will handle all issues of law brought before our courts. One living soul vs. another living soul. Both being allowed to tell all sides and adjudicated by a common law people's jury.
Fact: I declare it to be true The Republic of Texas is the last Sovereign Nation left in the world. Remember the Alamo, remember Goliad, remember San Jacinto and remember that the LAND OF TEXAS WILL FOREVER REMAIN FOR THE PEOPLE.
I, me, the secured Party am not an expert in the Law however I, do know right from wrong. If there is any human being that is being unjustly damaged by any statements herein, if he/she will inform us by facts I, will sincerely will make every effort to amend my ways. I, hereby and herein reserve the right to amend and make amendment to this document as necessary in order that the truth may be ascertained and proceeding justly determined. If any person has information that will controvert and overcome this Declaration, since this is a commercial matter, in law please advise me IN WRITTEN DECLARATION/AFFIDAVIT FORM within the thirty (30) days from receipt hereof, providing me with your counter Declaration/affidavit, proving with particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and not merely the ultimate facts of conclusions of law that this affidavit by Declaration is substantially and materially false sufficiently to change materially the status and factual declaration. Your silence stands as consent to, and tacit approval of, the factual declarations here being established as fact as a matter of law and this affidavit by Declaration will stand as final judgment. The land known as Texas is forever a Republic.
The Undersigned, me, the Secured Party, holder in due course of original does herewith declare, state and say that Secured Party, issues this Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit of Truth in Commerce with sincere intent in truth, that Secured Party is competent to state the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, and reasonable and just to the best of the Secured Party's knowledge.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal. Notice to the principal is notice to the agent.
I, me explicitly reserve all of my Rights.
I, me explicitly reserve all my unalienable Rights without prejudice under Texas Rules of civil Procedures 815.
I, me explicitly reserve all my unalienable Rights without prejudice under your Title 28 U.S.C. Section 2072(b).
I, me explicitly reserve all my unalienable Rights without prejudice under foreign law U.C.C. 1-207
With full reservation of all my natural God given substantive rights without prejudice under the State Constitution by laws of the Republic pursuant to T.R.C.P. 53. Executed under your title 28 U.S.C. 1746 (1) and TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE Section 602.004 this ____ day of the month of October in the year of 2002 by me,___________________
Republic and alleged commercial State of Texas
pursuant to T.R.C.P. 53
County of Dallas
Signed and Sealed
This instrument, Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit of Truth in Commerce Presented by me, Ricardo Elian, living soul, one of We the People upon the land known as Texas as required by laws of the Republic pursuant to T.R.C.P. 53 was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, pursuant to TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE Section 602.004 on this_____ day of the ____ month in the year of our Lord and savior, Jesus Christ two-thousand Two A. D.
Name: ______________________________________ Seal:
Notary Public
WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION, FORM SSA-521
December 20, 2002
For anyone wishing to get rid of their SS#.
1-Fill out two copies of the withdrawal Form.
http://www.ssa.gov/online/ssa-521.pdf
2- Take them to a SS office or mail Certified and get a clerk to stamp as received. They will try everything to talk you out of this. Don't let them. Leave one Copy for them.
3- Make two copies of the stamped received copy and make you an Affidavit of what you have done to this point.
4- Take two original Affidavits with attached SS withdrawal form to your County Recorders office and get both stamped as recorded into the County Records.
5- Send one copy to the Secretary of State or PERSON over the UNITED STATES SS Department and request your Recorded Documents be recorded into their records. Send this Registered Mail with Signature required.
6- After 30 days your unrebutted Recordings are now law and will stand where ever you need them.
7- Then if they or anyone claims you can't quit Charge them criminally with political rights violations and involuntary servitude.
republic of Texas, T. R. C. P. Rule 53
Commercial state of Texas
county of Dallas
signed and sealed
NON-NEGOTIABLE DECLARATION OF A FACT BY AFFIDAVIT
Know all other Sovereigns, and men, women, and persons, principals and agents,
I, ( Your title AKA NAME), Declarant, I, Me, a Citizen/sovereign, Kemper v. State, 138 S. W. 1025, page 1043, declare that Declarant is a man, with life, over the age of twenty-one years, is a Sovereign man upon the land contained within the outer borders of the de jure republic of Texas, maintains a lawful domicile within the outer borders of the county of Dallas, is competent for declaring, has first-hand knowledge of the facts related herein, and the facts are true.
I, ( Your title AKA NAME), Declarant, declare that the attached document entitled 'REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION, FORM SSA-521' is a true copy of the original document I filed into the Social Security Administration office located at the corner of Masters Street and Lake June Road in Dallas, Texas at approximately 1400 hours on October 1, 2002, and said original was properly received and file marked by supervisor G. Carbarjal. Said filing confirms the cancellation of Social Security Number by affidavit which I sent to the Social Security Administration in 1990.
I, ( Your title AKA NAME), Declarant, declare that I am not now, nor have I ever willingly and knowingly been a member of the National Socialist Democracy, and I am not a UNITED STATES CITIZEN, and further, I have always been a Citizen/sovereign, one of the People, in either Louisiana beginning on my date of nativity, November 28, 1951, and now, having accrued the privileges and immunities of citizenship in Texas, I am one of the People, Citizens/sovereign in the land of the republic of Texas ab initio and nunc pro tunc, October 22, 1986.
Declared, signed, executed, and sealed on October 1, 2002, under penalty of perjury without the UNITED STATES, Title 28 USC 3002(15), Title 28 USC 1746(1), and the Texas Government Code 602.004.
L. S. _________________________________________________
( Your title AKA NAME), a man, Citizen/sovereign, Declarant
VERIFICATION
COMMERCIAL STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
Signed and Sealed
On October 1, 2002, ( Your title AKA NAME), a man from the county of Dallas, appeared before me, a notary public for the STATE OF TEXAS, and after I administered the oath to him, he did declare that he has read the forgoing and that the foregoing is true.
____________________________
Notary Public,
|
|
|
